Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude 3 Opus

Compare Anthropic and Anthropic AI models

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

Claude 3 Opus

Try Anthropic →

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Per Request:$0.002800

Daily:$0.28

Monthly:$8.40

Yearly:$102.20

Claude 3 Opus

Per Request:$0.0525

Daily:$5.25

Monthly:$157.50

Yearly:$1,916.25

Cost Differences

+$0.0497

Per Request

+$4.97

Daily

+$149.10

Monthly

+$1,814.05

Yearly

Claude 3 Opus costs more than Claude 3.5 Haiku

Feature Comparison

Feature	Claude 3.5 Haiku	Claude 3 Opus
Provider	Anthropic	Anthropic
Input Price	$0.80/1M tokens	$15.00/1M tokens
Output Price	$4.00/1M tokens	$75.00/1M tokens
Context Window	200,000 tokens	200,000 tokens
Max Output	8,192 tokens	4,096 tokens
Category	efficient	flagship
Capabilities	textvision	textvisionreasoning
Release Date	11/4/2024	3/4/2024

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude 3 Opus: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Claude 3 Opus depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude 3.5 Haiku is the more affordable option at $0.80/1M input tokens — 95% cheaper than Claude 3 Opus.

These models target different tiers: Claude 3.5 Haiku is a efficient model while Claude 3 Opus is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude 3 Opus targets more demanding workloads, while Claude 3.5 Haiku provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3.5 Haiku charges $4.00/1M output tokens vs $75.00 for Claude 3 Opus. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude 3.5 Haiku has the edge here at $4.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku when:

• Budget is a primary concern
• You need longer outputs (up to 8,192 tokens)
• You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
• You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Claude 3 Opus when:

• You need more capabilities (reasoning)
• You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic)

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

Claude 3 Opus (Anthropic)

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

Start using Claude 3.5 Haiku today

Start using Claude 3 Opus today

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Claude 3 Opus?▼

Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper for input tokens at $0.80 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude 3 Opus — that's 95% savings on input costs.

What is the context window difference between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Claude 3 Opus?▼

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200,000 tokens while Claude 3 Opus supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼

Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Claude 3.5 Haiku is the lower-cost option, while Claude 3.5 Haiku offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku for budget sensitivity or Claude 3.5 Haiku for longer context tasks.

Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼

At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3.5 Haiku costs about $8.40/month and Claude 3 Opus costs about $157.50/month. Overall, Claude 3.5 Haiku has lower combined input + output rates ($0.80 in, $4.00 out) vs Claude 3 Opus.