Cohere vs Meta (via Together AI) Pricing Comparison
Full API pricing breakdown, model lineups, and category coverage.
Decision Guide: Which Provider Should You Choose?
If your priority is pure token cost, Meta (via Together AI) has the lower average combined input + output rate in this comparison at about $2.063333/1M.
Choose Cohere when...
- you want model flexibility over lowest average price.
- you want Cohere's lowest-cost model (Command R) for budget-sensitive traffic.
- your workload fits Cohere's category lineup.
Tradeoff: Cohere is pricier on average than Meta (via Together AI).
Choose Meta (via Together AI) when...
- you want lower average token pricing.
- you want Meta (via Together AI)'s lowest-cost model (Llama 3.1 8B) for budget-sensitive traffic.
- your workload fits Meta (via Together AI)'s stronger coverage in flagship, balanced, efficient.
Tradeoff: Cohere has premium models that may offer broader capabilities.
Coverage snapshot: Cohere supports 2/4 major categories and Meta (via Together AI) supports 3/4.
Related Links
Cohere provider pricingMeta (via Together AI) provider pricingAll model comparisonsAll providersUnified pricing table
Popular Cohere vs Meta (via Together AI) model matchups
Category Breakdown
| Provider | flagship | reasoning | balanced | efficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohere | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Meta (via Together AI) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
All Models & Pricing
Cohere
Provider details →| Model | Category | Input | Output | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Command R | efficient | $0.15/1M | $0.60/1M | 128,000 |
| Command R+ | flagship | $2.50/1M | $10.00/1M | 128,000 |
Meta (via Together AI)
Provider details →| Model | Category | Input | Output | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 8B | efficient | $0.18/1M | $0.18/1M | 128,000 |
| Llama 4 Scout | efficient | $0.08/1M | $0.30/1M | 10,000,000 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | flagship | $0.27/1M | $0.85/1M | 1,000,000 |
| Llama 3.3 70B | standard | $0.88/1M | $0.88/1M | 131,072 |
| Llama 3.1 70B | balanced | $0.88/1M | $0.88/1M | 128,000 |
| Llama 3.1 405B | flagship | $3.50/1M | $3.50/1M | 128,000 |
Cross-Provider Model Matchups
Browse all model comparisons →Meta (via Together AI) vs Cohere
Llama 4 Scout vs Command R+
efficient · flagship
Meta (via Together AI) vs Cohere
Llama 4 Scout vs Command R
efficient · efficient
Meta (via Together AI) vs Cohere
Llama 4 Maverick vs Command R+
flagship · flagship
Meta (via Together AI) vs Cohere
Llama 4 Maverick vs Command R
flagship · efficient
Meta (via Together AI) vs Cohere
Llama 3.1 405B vs Command R+
flagship · flagship
Meta (via Together AI) vs Cohere
Llama 3.1 405B vs Command R
flagship · efficient
Meta (via Together AI) vs Cohere
Llama 3.3 70B vs Command R+
standard · flagship
Meta (via Together AI) vs Cohere
Llama 3.3 70B vs Command R
standard · efficient
Meta (via Together AI) vs Cohere
Llama 3.1 70B vs Command R+
balanced · flagship
Meta (via Together AI) vs Cohere
Llama 3.1 70B vs Command R
balanced · efficient
Meta (via Together AI) vs Cohere
Llama 3.1 8B vs Command R+
efficient · flagship
Meta (via Together AI) vs Cohere
Llama 3.1 8B vs Command R
efficient · efficient
Get started with Cohere
Sign Up for Cohere →Get started with Meta (via Together AI)
Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI) →Frequently Asked Questions
Which provider is cheaper on average, Cohere or Meta (via Together AI)?▼
On average, Meta (via Together AI) has lower combined input + output rates. Compare model-specific pricing to match your workload.
What is the cheapest model across Cohere and Meta (via Together AI)?▼
Llama 3.1 8B (Meta (via Together AI)) is the lowest-cost option at $0.18 input and $0.18 output per million tokens.
Which model is the most expensive between these providers?▼
Command R+ (Cohere) is the highest-cost model in this comparison at $2.50 input and $10.00 output per million tokens.
Which provider has more models available?▼
Meta (via Together AI) offers more models in this dataset.