Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
o1
o3-mini
Cost Differences
o3-mini costs less than o1
Feature Comparison
| Feature | o1 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Input Price | $15.00/1M tokens | $1.10/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $60.00/1M tokens | $4.40/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 500,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 65,536 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Category | reasoning | reasoning |
| Capabilities | textreasoning | textreasoningcode |
| Release Date | 9/12/2024 | 1/31/2025 |
o1 vs o3-mini: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between o1 and o3-mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. o3-mini is the more affordable option at $1.10/1M input tokens — 93% cheaper than o1. Meanwhile, o3-mini offers a significantly larger context window at 500,000 tokens vs 200,000 for o1.
Both models are in the reasoning category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: o3-mini would save you roughly $12,510.00/month compared to o1. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.
Output costs matter too. o1 charges $60.00/1M output tokens vs $4.40 for o3-mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. o3-mini has the edge here at $4.40/1M output tokens.
Best Use Cases
Choose o1 when:
- • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
Choose o3-mini when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need a larger context window (500,000 tokens)
- • You need more capabilities (code)
- • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
o1 (OpenAI)
o3-mini (OpenAI)
Start using o1 today
Sign Up for OpenAI →Start using o3-mini today
Sign Up for OpenAI →