Skip to main content

o1-mini vs o3-mini

o1-mini vs o3-mini: o1-mini is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($1.10/M vs $1.10/M input tokens), while o3-mini is better for long-context tasks (500,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose o1-mini for lower token spend and choose o3-mini when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

OpenAI
o1-mini
vs
OpenAI
o3-mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

o1-mini

Per Request:$0.003300
Daily:$0.33
Monthly:$9.90
Yearly:$120.45

o3-mini

Per Request:$0.003300
Daily:$0.33
Monthly:$9.90
Yearly:$120.45

Cost Differences

$0.00
Per Request
$0.00
Daily
$0.00
Monthly
$0.00
Yearly

o3-mini costs less than o1-mini

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: o1-mini. At the default workload, o1-mini saves about $0.00/month ($0.00/year) versus o3-mini.

Feature Comparison

Featureo1-minio3-mini
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Input Price$1.10/1M tokens$1.10/1M tokens
Output Price$4.40/1M tokens$4.40/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens500,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryreasoningreasoning
Capabilities
textreasoning
textreasoningcode
Release Date9/12/20241/31/2025

o1-mini vs o3-mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between o1-mini and o3-mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. o3-mini is the more affordable option at $1.10/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, o3-mini offers a significantly larger context window at 500,000 tokens vs 128,000 for o1-mini.

Both models are in the reasoning category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: o3-mini would save you roughly $0.00/month compared to o1-mini. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. o1-mini charges $4.40/1M output tokens vs $4.40 for o3-mini.

Best Use Cases

Choose o1-mini when:

  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose o3-mini when:

  • • You need a larger context window (500,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (code)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

o1-mini

  • Input pricing: $1.10/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.40/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than o3-mini

o3-mini

  • Input pricing: $1.10/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.40/M tokens
  • Context window: 500,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

o1-mini (OpenAI)

o3-mini (OpenAI)

Start using o1-mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using o3-mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, o1-mini or o3-mini?
o3-mini is cheaper for input tokens at $1.10 per million tokens vs $1.10 for o1-mini.
What is the context window difference between o1-mini and o3-mini?
o1-mini supports 128,000 tokens while o3-mini supports 500,000 tokens — a difference of 372,000 tokens in favor of o3-mini.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, o3-mini is the lower-cost option, while o3-mini offers a larger context window (500,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose o3-mini for budget sensitivity or o3-mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, o1-mini costs about $9.90/month and o3-mini costs about $9.90/month. Overall, o3-mini has lower combined input + output rates ($1.10 in, $4.40 out) vs o1-mini.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.