Skip to main content

o1-mini vs o3-mini

Pricing verdict: o1-mini vs o3-mini: pricing is a tie at $1.10/M input and $4.40/M output. The real choice is context: o3-mini is better for long-context tasks (500,000 tokens vs 128,000).

Direct answer: pricing is a tie. Choose o3-mini for the larger 500K context window, or pick o1-mini if 128K is already enough for your workload.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

OpenAI
o1-mini
vs
OpenAI
o3-mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

o1-mini

Per Request:$0.003300
Daily:$0.33
Monthly:$9.90
Yearly:$120.45

o3-mini

Per Request:$0.003300
Daily:$0.33
Monthly:$9.90
Yearly:$120.45

Cost Differences

$0.00
Per Request
$0.00
Daily
$0.00
Monthly
$0.00
Yearly

Both models cost the same at the default workload.

Quick Recommendation

Direct API pricing is a tie at the default workload: both land around $9.90/month. Pick o3-mini if you need the larger 500K context window; otherwise choose the model that better fits your workflow.

Feature Comparison

Featureo1-minio3-mini
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Input Price$1.10/1M tokens$1.10/1M tokens
Output Price$4.40/1M tokens$4.40/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens500,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryreasoningreasoning
Capabilities
textreasoning
textreasoningcode
Release Date9/12/20241/31/2025

o1-mini vs o3-mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between o1-mini and o3-mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Both models cost the same on input and output tokens, so raw price is a tie. Meanwhile, o3-mini offers a significantly larger context window at 500,000 tokens vs 128,000 for o1-mini.

Both models are in the reasoning category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — direct API pricing stays tied, so the real decision is context, latency, and provider fit.

Output costs matter too. o1-mini charges $4.40/1M output tokens vs $4.40 for o3-mini.

Best Use Cases

Choose o1-mini when:

  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose o3-mini when:

  • • You need a larger context window (500,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (code)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

o1-mini

  • Input pricing: $1.10/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.40/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than o3-mini

o3-mini

  • Input pricing: $1.10/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.40/M tokens
  • Context window: 500,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

o1-mini (OpenAI)

o3-mini (OpenAI)

Start using o1-mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using o3-mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, o1-mini or o3-mini?
They are priced the same at $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens. The real difference is context and workload fit: o3-mini gives you 500,000 tokens of context vs 128,000 for o1-mini.
What is the context window difference between o1-mini and o3-mini?
o1-mini supports 128,000 tokens while o3-mini supports 500,000 tokens — a difference of 372,000 tokens in favor of o3-mini.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text, and direct token pricing is tied. For ai chatbot, start with o3-mini if you need the larger 500,000-token context window; otherwise choose the model whose provider, tools, or latency profile fits better.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, both models land at about $9.90/month. There is no direct price winner at this workload, so decide based on context window, capabilities, and provider fit.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.