Skip to main content

Mistral Small 4 vs o3

Compare Mistral AI and OpenAI AI models

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 4
vs
OpenAI
o3

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Mistral Small 4

Per Request:$0.000450
Daily:$0.045
Monthly:$1.35
Yearly:$16.425

o3

Per Request:$0.006000
Daily:$0.60
Monthly:$18.00
Yearly:$219.00

Cost Differences

+$0.005550
Per Request
+$0.555
Daily
+$16.65
Monthly
+$202.575
Yearly

o3 costs more than Mistral Small 4

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Small 4o3
ProviderMistral AIOpenAI
Input Price$0.15/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$0.60/1M tokens$8.00/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output16,384 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryefficientreasoning
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textreasoningvisioncode
Release Date3/18/20264/16/2025

Mistral Small 4 vs o3: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Mistral Small 4 and o3 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Small 4 is the more affordable option at $0.15/1M input tokens93% cheaper than o3. Meanwhile, o3 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Mistral Small 4.

These models come from different providers — Mistral AI and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Mistral AI, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Mistral Small 4 is a efficient model while o3 is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o3 targets more demanding workloads, while Mistral Small 4 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Mistral Small 4 charges $0.60/1M output tokens vs $8.00 for o3. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Small 4 has the edge here at $0.60/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Mistral Small 4 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose o3 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Mistral Small 4 (Mistral AI)

o3 (OpenAI)

Start using Mistral Small 4 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Start using o3 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 4 or o3?
Mistral Small 4 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.15 per million tokens vs $2.00 for o3 — that's 93% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Mistral Small 4 and o3?
Mistral Small 4 supports 128,000 tokens while o3 supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 872,000 tokens in favor of o3.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Mistral Small 4 is the lower-cost option, while o3 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Mistral Small 4 for budget sensitivity or o3 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Mistral Small 4 costs about $1.35/month and o3 costs about $18.00/month. Overall, Mistral Small 4 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.15 in, $0.60 out) vs o3.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles