Skip to main content

Mistral Small 3.2 vs Mistral Small 4

Compare Mistral AI and Mistral AI AI models

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 4

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Mistral Small 3.2

Per Request:$0.000150
Daily:$0.015
Monthly:$0.45
Yearly:$5.475

Mistral Small 4

Per Request:$0.000450
Daily:$0.045
Monthly:$1.35
Yearly:$16.425

Cost Differences

+$0.000300
Per Request
+$0.03
Daily
+$0.90
Monthly
+$10.95
Yearly

Mistral Small 4 costs more than Mistral Small 3.2

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Small 3.2Mistral Small 4
ProviderMistral AIMistral AI
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.15/1M tokens
Output Price$0.18/1M tokens$0.60/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens16,384 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
textcode
textvisioncodereasoning
Release Date12/2/20253/18/2026

Mistral Small 3.2 vs Mistral Small 4: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Mistral Small 3.2 and Mistral Small 4 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Small 3.2 is the more affordable option at $0.06/1M input tokens60% cheaper than Mistral Small 4.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Mistral Small 3.2 would save you roughly $90.00/month compared to Mistral Small 4. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Mistral Small 3.2 charges $0.18/1M output tokens vs $0.60 for Mistral Small 4. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Small 3.2 has the edge here at $0.18/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Mistral Small 4 supports vision (image inputs) while Mistral Small 3.2 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Mistral Small 3.2 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Mistral Small 4 when:

  • • You need more capabilities (vision, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 16,384 tokens)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Mistral Small 3.2 (Mistral AI)

Mistral Small 4 (Mistral AI)

Start using Mistral Small 3.2 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Start using Mistral Small 4 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 or Mistral Small 4?
Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.06 per million tokens vs $0.15 for Mistral Small 4 — that's 60% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Mistral Small 3.2 and Mistral Small 4?
Mistral Small 3.2 supports 128,000 tokens while Mistral Small 4 supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Mistral Small 3.2.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Mistral Small 3.2 is the lower-cost option, while Mistral Small 3.2 offers a larger context window (128,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Mistral Small 3.2 for budget sensitivity or Mistral Small 3.2 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Mistral Small 3.2 costs about $0.45/month and Mistral Small 4 costs about $1.35/month. Overall, Mistral Small 3.2 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.06 in, $0.18 out) vs Mistral Small 4.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles