Skip to main content

Mistral Medium 3 vs o1

Compare Mistral AI and OpenAI AI models

Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3
vs
OpenAI
o1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Mistral Medium 3

Per Request:$0.001400
Daily:$0.14
Monthly:$4.20
Yearly:$51.10

o1

Per Request:$0.045
Daily:$4.50
Monthly:$135.00
Yearly:$1,642.50

Cost Differences

+$0.0436
Per Request
+$4.36
Daily
+$130.80
Monthly
+$1,591.40
Yearly

o1 costs more than Mistral Medium 3

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Medium 3o1
ProviderMistral AIOpenAI
Input Price$0.40/1M tokens$15.00/1M tokens
Output Price$2.00/1M tokens$60.00/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output16,384 tokens65,536 tokens
Categorybalancedreasoning
Capabilities
textcode
textreasoning
Release Date5/7/20259/12/2024

Mistral Medium 3 vs o1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Mistral Medium 3 and o1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Medium 3 is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M input tokens97% cheaper than o1. Meanwhile, o1 offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Mistral Medium 3.

These models come from different providers — Mistral AI and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Mistral AI, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Mistral Medium 3 is a balanced model while o1 is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o1 targets more demanding workloads, while Mistral Medium 3 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Mistral Medium 3 charges $2.00/1M output tokens vs $60.00 for o1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Medium 3 has the edge here at $2.00/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Mistral Medium 3 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Choose o1 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral AI)

o1 (OpenAI)

Start using Mistral Medium 3 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Start using o1 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3 or o1?
Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.40 per million tokens vs $15.00 for o1 — that's 97% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Mistral Medium 3 and o1?
Mistral Medium 3 supports 128,000 tokens while o1 supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of o1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Mistral Medium 3 is the lower-cost option, while o1 offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Mistral Medium 3 for budget sensitivity or o1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Mistral Medium 3 costs about $4.20/month and o1 costs about $135.00/month. Overall, Mistral Medium 3 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.40 in, $2.00 out) vs o1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles