Ministral 3 14B vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Ministral 3 14B vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Ministral 3 14B is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.20/M vs $1.50/M input tokens), while Ministral 3 14B is better for long-context tasks (256,000 tokens).
Direct answer: choose Ministral 3 14B for lower token spend and choose Ministral 3 14B when your workload needs longer context.
Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Ministral 3 14B
Mistral Medium 3.5
Cost Differences
Mistral Medium 3.5 costs more than Ministral 3 14B
Quick Recommendation
Winner for direct API pricing: Ministral 3 14B. At the default workload, Ministral 3 14B saves about $14.85/month ($180.675/year) versus Mistral Medium 3.5.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Ministral 3 14B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.20/1M tokens | $1.50/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.20/1M tokens | $7.50/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 256,000 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 32,768 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Category | balanced | flagship |
| Capabilities | textvision | textvisioncodereasoning |
| Release Date | 12/2/2025 | 4/29/2026 |
Ministral 3 14B vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Ministral 3 14B and Mistral Medium 3.5 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Ministral 3 14B is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens — 87% cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5.
These models target different tiers: Ministral 3 14B is a balanced model while Mistral Medium 3.5 is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Mistral Medium 3.5 targets more demanding workloads, while Ministral 3 14B provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. Ministral 3 14B charges $0.20/1M output tokens vs $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Ministral 3 14B has the edge here at $0.20/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.
Best Use Cases
Choose Ministral 3 14B when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when:
- • You need more capabilities (code, reasoning)
- • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
Pros and Caveats at a Glance
Ministral 3 14B
- • Input pricing: $0.20/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $0.20/M tokens
- • Context window: 256,000 tokens
- • Max output: 32,768 tokens
Watch out for
- • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.
Mistral Medium 3.5
- • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $7.50/M tokens
- • Context window: 256,000 tokens
- • Max output: 32,768 tokens
Watch out for
- • Higher input cost than Ministral 3 14B
- • Higher output cost than Ministral 3 14B
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Ministral 3 14B (Mistral AI)
Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI)
Start using Ministral 3 14B today
Sign Up for Mistral AI →Start using Mistral Medium 3.5 today
Sign Up for Mistral AI →Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 14B or Mistral Medium 3.5?▼
What is the context window difference between Ministral 3 14B and Mistral Medium 3.5?▼
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.