Magistral Medium vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Magistral Medium vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($1.50/M vs $2.00/M input tokens), while Mistral Medium 3.5 is better for long-context tasks (256,000 tokens).
Direct answer: choose Mistral Medium 3.5 for lower token spend and choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when your workload needs longer context.
Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Magistral Medium
Mistral Medium 3.5
Cost Differences
Mistral Medium 3.5 costs more than Magistral Medium
Quick Recommendation
Winner for direct API pricing: Magistral Medium. At the default workload, Magistral Medium saves about $2.25/month ($27.375/year) versus Mistral Medium 3.5.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Magistral Medium | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $2.00/1M tokens | $1.50/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $5.00/1M tokens | $7.50/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 128,000 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 32,768 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Category | reasoning | flagship |
| Capabilities | textreasoning | textvisioncodereasoning |
| Release Date | 12/15/2025 | 4/29/2026 |
Magistral Medium vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Magistral Medium and Mistral Medium 3.5 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Magistral Medium is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, Mistral Medium 3.5 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Magistral Medium.
These models target different tiers: Magistral Medium is a reasoning model while Mistral Medium 3.5 is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Magistral Medium is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Mistral Medium 3.5 offers better value for routine operations.
Output costs matter too. Magistral Medium charges $5.00/1M output tokens vs $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Magistral Medium has the edge here at $5.00/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Mistral Medium 3.5 supports vision (image inputs) while Magistral Medium is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.
Best Use Cases
Choose Magistral Medium when:
- • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
- • You need more capabilities (vision, code)
- • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
Pros and Caveats at a Glance
Magistral Medium
- • Input pricing: $2.00/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $5.00/M tokens
- • Context window: 128,000 tokens
- • Max output: 32,768 tokens
Watch out for
- • Higher input cost than Mistral Medium 3.5
- • Smaller context window than Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral Medium 3.5
- • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $7.50/M tokens
- • Context window: 256,000 tokens
- • Max output: 32,768 tokens
Watch out for
- • Higher output cost than Magistral Medium
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Magistral Medium (Mistral AI)
Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI)
Start using Magistral Medium today
Sign Up for Mistral AI →Start using Mistral Medium 3.5 today
Sign Up for Mistral AI →Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Mistral Medium 3.5?▼
What is the context window difference between Magistral Medium and Mistral Medium 3.5?▼
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.