Magistral Medium vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare Mistral AI and Mistral AI AI models

Mistral AI

Magistral Medium

Mistral AI

Mistral Medium 3.1

Try Mistral AI →

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Magistral Medium

Per Request:$0.004500

Daily:$0.45

Monthly:$13.50

Yearly:$164.25

Mistral Medium 3.1

Per Request:$0.001400

Daily:$0.14

Monthly:$4.20

Yearly:$51.10

Cost Differences

$0.003100

Per Request

$0.31

Daily

$9.30

Monthly

$113.15

Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less than Magistral Medium

Feature Comparison

Feature	Magistral Medium	Mistral Medium 3.1
Provider	Mistral AI	Mistral AI
Input Price	$2.00/1M tokens	$0.40/1M tokens
Output Price	$5.00/1M tokens	$2.00/1M tokens
Context Window	128,000 tokens	131,072 tokens
Max Output	32,768 tokens	16,384 tokens
Category	reasoning	balanced
Capabilities	textreasoning	textcodereasoning
Release Date	12/15/2025	8/1/2025

Magistral Medium vs Mistral Medium 3.1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Magistral Medium and Mistral Medium 3.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Medium 3.1 is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M input tokens — 80% cheaper than Magistral Medium. Meanwhile, Mistral Medium 3.1 offers a significantly larger context window at 131,072 tokens vs 128,000 for Magistral Medium.

These models target different tiers: Magistral Medium is a reasoning model while Mistral Medium 3.1 is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Magistral Medium is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Mistral Medium 3.1 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Magistral Medium charges $5.00/1M output tokens vs $2.00 for Mistral Medium 3.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Medium 3.1 has the edge here at $2.00/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Magistral Medium when:

• You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
• You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 when:

• Budget is a primary concern
• You need a larger context window (131,072 tokens)
• You need more capabilities (code)
• You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Magistral Medium (Mistral AI)

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

Mistral Medium 3.1 (Mistral AI)

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

Start using Magistral Medium today

Start using Mistral Medium 3.1 today

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Mistral Medium 3.1?▼

Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.40 per million tokens vs $2.00 for Magistral Medium — that's 80% savings on input costs.

What is the context window difference between Magistral Medium and Mistral Medium 3.1?▼

Magistral Medium supports 128,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.1 supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 3,072 tokens in favor of Mistral Medium 3.1.

Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼

Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Mistral Medium 3.1 is the lower-cost option, while Mistral Medium 3.1 offers a larger context window (131,072 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 for budget sensitivity or Mistral Medium 3.1 for longer context tasks.

Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼

At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Magistral Medium costs about $13.50/month and Mistral Medium 3.1 costs about $4.20/month. Overall, Mistral Medium 3.1 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.40 in, $2.00 out) vs Magistral Medium.