Skip to main content

Llama 4 Scout vs Voxtral Small

Pricing verdict: Llama 4 Scout vs Voxtral Small: Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.08/M vs $0.10/M input tokens), while Llama 4 Scout is better for long-context tasks (10,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 4 Scout for lower token spend and choose Llama 4 Scout when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Scout
vs
Mistral AI
Voxtral Small

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 4 Scout

Per Request:$0.000230
Daily:$0.023
Monthly:$0.69
Yearly:$8.395

Voxtral Small

Per Request:$0.000300
Daily:$0.03
Monthly:$0.90
Yearly:$10.95

Cost Differences

+$0.000070
Per Request
+$0.007000
Daily
+$0.21
Monthly
+$2.555
Yearly

Voxtral Small costs more than Llama 4 Scout

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 ScoutVoxtral Small
ProviderMeta (via Together AI)Mistral AI
Input Price$0.08/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Output Price$0.30/1M tokens$0.40/1M tokens
Context Window10,000,000 tokens32,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens8,192 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
textvisioncode
textaudiotranscription
Release Date4/5/20257/15/2026

Llama 4 Scout vs Voxtral Small: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 4 Scout and Voxtral Small depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.08/1M input tokens — 20% cheaper than Voxtral Small. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Scout offers a significantly larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens vs 32,000 for Voxtral Small.

These models come from different providers — Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Meta (via Together AI), switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 4 Scout would save you roughly $21.00/month compared to Voxtral Small. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Llama 4 Scout charges $0.30/1M output tokens vs $0.40 for Voxtral Small. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Scout has the edge here at $0.30/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Llama 4 Scout supports vision (image inputs) while Voxtral Small is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Voxtral Small when:

  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Llama 4 Scout

  • Input pricing: $0.08/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.30/M tokens
  • Context window: 10,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Voxtral Small

  • Input pricing: $0.10/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.40/M tokens
  • Context window: 32,000 tokens
  • Max output: 8,192 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Llama 4 Scout
  • Higher output cost than Llama 4 Scout
  • Smaller context window than Llama 4 Scout

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 4 Scout (Meta (via Together AI))

Voxtral Small (Mistral AI)

Start using Llama 4 Scout today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Start using Voxtral Small today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Voxtral Small?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input tokens at $0.08 per million tokens vs $0.10 for Voxtral Small — that's 20% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Llama 4 Scout and Voxtral Small?
Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens while Voxtral Small supports 32,000 tokens — a difference of 9,968,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Scout.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Scout is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10,000,000 vs 32,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Scout for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Scout for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 4 Scout costs about $0.69/month and Voxtral Small costs about $0.90/month. Overall, Llama 4 Scout has lower combined input + output rates ($0.08 in, $0.30 out) vs Voxtral Small.
Where can I compare Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Meta (via Together AI) vs Mistral AI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.