Skip to main content

Llama 4 Scout vs o1 Pro

Compare Meta (via Together AI) and OpenAI AI models

Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Scout
vs
OpenAI
o1 Pro

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 4 Scout

Per Request:$0.000230
Daily:$0.023
Monthly:$0.69
Yearly:$8.395

o1 Pro

Per Request:$0.45
Daily:$45.00
Monthly:$1,350.00
Yearly:$16,425.00

Cost Differences

+$0.44977
Per Request
+$44.977
Daily
+$1,349.31
Monthly
+$16,416.605
Yearly

o1 Pro costs more than Llama 4 Scout

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 Scouto1 Pro
ProviderMeta (via Together AI)OpenAI
Input Price$0.08/1M tokens$150.00/1M tokens
Output Price$0.30/1M tokens$600.00/1M tokens
Context Window10,000,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens100,000 tokens
Categoryefficientflagship
Capabilities
textvisioncode
textvisioncodereasoning
Release Date4/5/202512/17/2024

Llama 4 Scout vs o1 Pro: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 4 Scout and o1 Pro depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.08/1M input tokens100% cheaper than o1 Pro. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Scout offers a significantly larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for o1 Pro.

These models come from different providers — Meta (via Together AI) and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Meta (via Together AI), switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Llama 4 Scout is a efficient model while o1 Pro is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o1 Pro targets more demanding workloads, while Llama 4 Scout provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Llama 4 Scout charges $0.30/1M output tokens vs $600.00 for o1 Pro. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Scout has the edge here at $0.30/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose o1 Pro when:

  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 100,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 4 Scout (Meta (via Together AI))

o1 Pro (OpenAI)

Start using Llama 4 Scout today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Start using o1 Pro today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or o1 Pro?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input tokens at $0.08 per million tokens vs $150.00 for o1 Pro — that's 100% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Llama 4 Scout and o1 Pro?
Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens while o1 Pro supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 9,800,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Scout.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Scout is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Scout for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Scout for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 4 Scout costs about $0.69/month and o1 Pro costs about $1,350.00/month. Overall, Llama 4 Scout has lower combined input + output rates ($0.08 in, $0.30 out) vs o1 Pro.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles