Skip to main content

Llama 4 Maverick vs o4-mini

Compare Meta (via Together AI) and OpenAI AI models

Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Maverick
vs
OpenAI
o4-mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 4 Maverick

Per Request:$0.000695
Daily:$0.0695
Monthly:$2.085
Yearly:$25.3675

o4-mini

Per Request:$0.003300
Daily:$0.33
Monthly:$9.90
Yearly:$120.45

Cost Differences

+$0.002605
Per Request
+$0.2605
Daily
+$7.815
Monthly
+$95.0825
Yearly

o4-mini costs more than Llama 4 Maverick

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 Mavericko4-mini
ProviderMeta (via Together AI)OpenAI
Input Price$0.27/1M tokens$1.10/1M tokens
Output Price$0.85/1M tokens$4.40/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens2,000,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisioncode
textreasoningcode
Release Date4/5/20254/16/2025

Llama 4 Maverick vs o4-mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 4 Maverick and o4-mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.27/1M input tokens75% cheaper than o4-mini. Meanwhile, o4-mini offers a significantly larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens vs 1,000,000 for Llama 4 Maverick.

These models come from different providers — Meta (via Together AI) and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Meta (via Together AI), switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Llama 4 Maverick is a flagship model while o4-mini is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 4 Maverick is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while o4-mini offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Llama 4 Maverick charges $0.85/1M output tokens vs $4.40 for o4-mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Maverick has the edge here at $0.85/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Llama 4 Maverick supports vision (image inputs) while o4-mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Choose o4-mini when:

  • • You need a larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 4 Maverick (Meta (via Together AI))

o4-mini (OpenAI)

Start using Llama 4 Maverick today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Start using o4-mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or o4-mini?
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for input tokens at $0.27 per million tokens vs $1.10 for o4-mini — that's 75% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Llama 4 Maverick and o4-mini?
Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens while o4-mini supports 2,000,000 tokens — a difference of 1,000,000 tokens in favor of o4-mini.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Maverick is the lower-cost option, while o4-mini offers a larger context window (2,000,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Maverick for budget sensitivity or o4-mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 4 Maverick costs about $2.085/month and o4-mini costs about $9.90/month. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick has lower combined input + output rates ($0.27 in, $0.85 out) vs o4-mini.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles