Skip to main content

Llama 4 Maverick vs o1

Compare Meta (via Together AI) and OpenAI AI models

Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Maverick
vs
OpenAI
o1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 4 Maverick

Per Request:$0.000695
Daily:$0.0695
Monthly:$2.085
Yearly:$25.3675

o1

Per Request:$0.045
Daily:$4.50
Monthly:$135.00
Yearly:$1,642.50

Cost Differences

+$0.044305
Per Request
+$4.4305
Daily
+$132.915
Monthly
+$1,617.1325
Yearly

o1 costs more than Llama 4 Maverick

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 Mavericko1
ProviderMeta (via Together AI)OpenAI
Input Price$0.27/1M tokens$15.00/1M tokens
Output Price$0.85/1M tokens$60.00/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisioncode
textreasoning
Release Date4/5/20259/12/2024

Llama 4 Maverick vs o1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 4 Maverick and o1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.27/1M input tokens98% cheaper than o1. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Maverick offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for o1.

These models come from different providers — Meta (via Together AI) and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Meta (via Together AI), switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Llama 4 Maverick is a flagship model while o1 is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 4 Maverick is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while o1 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Llama 4 Maverick charges $0.85/1M output tokens vs $60.00 for o1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Maverick has the edge here at $0.85/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Llama 4 Maverick supports vision (image inputs) while o1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, code)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Choose o1 when:

  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 4 Maverick (Meta (via Together AI))

o1 (OpenAI)

Start using Llama 4 Maverick today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Start using o1 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or o1?
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for input tokens at $0.27 per million tokens vs $15.00 for o1 — that's 98% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Llama 4 Maverick and o1?
Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens while o1 supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 800,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Maverick.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Maverick is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Maverick for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Maverick for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 4 Maverick costs about $2.085/month and o1 costs about $135.00/month. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick has lower combined input + output rates ($0.27 in, $0.85 out) vs o1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles