Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2
Compare Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Llama 4 Maverick
Mistral Small 3.2
Cost Differences
Mistral Small 3.2 costs less than Llama 4 Maverick
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Llama 4 Maverick | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta (via Together AI) | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.27/1M tokens | $0.06/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.85/1M tokens | $0.18/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 65,536 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Category | flagship | efficient |
| Capabilities | textvisioncode | textcode |
| Release Date | 4/5/2025 | 12/2/2025 |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Small 3.2: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Small 3.2 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Small 3.2 is the more affordable option at $0.06/1M input tokens — 78% cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Maverick offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Mistral Small 3.2.
These models come from different providers — Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Meta (via Together AI), switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
These models target different tiers: Llama 4 Maverick is a flagship model while Mistral Small 3.2 is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 4 Maverick is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Mistral Small 3.2 offers better value for routine operations.
Output costs matter too. Llama 4 Maverick charges $0.85/1M output tokens vs $0.18 for Mistral Small 3.2. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Small 3.2 has the edge here at $0.18/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Llama 4 Maverick supports vision (image inputs) while Mistral Small 3.2 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.
Best Use Cases
Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:
- • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
- • You need more capabilities (vision)
- • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
- • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
Choose Mistral Small 3.2 when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Llama 4 Maverick (Meta (via Together AI))
Mistral Small 3.2 (Mistral AI)
Start using Llama 4 Maverick today
Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI) →Start using Mistral Small 3.2 today
Sign Up for Mistral AI →