Skip to main content

Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.27/M vs $1.50/M input tokens), while Llama 4 Maverick is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 4 Maverick for lower token spend and choose Llama 4 Maverick when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Maverick
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 4 Maverick

Per Request:$0.000695
Daily:$0.0695
Monthly:$2.085
Yearly:$25.3675

Mistral Medium 3.5

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

+$0.004555
Per Request
+$0.4555
Daily
+$13.665
Monthly
+$166.2575
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs more than Llama 4 Maverick

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Llama 4 Maverick. At the default workload, Llama 4 Maverick saves about $13.665/month ($166.2575/year) versus Mistral Medium 3.5.

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 MaverickMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderMeta (via Together AI)Mistral AI
Input Price$0.27/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Output Price$0.85/1M tokens$7.50/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textvisioncode
textvisioncodereasoning
Release Date4/5/20254/29/2026

Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Medium 3.5 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.27/1M input tokens82% cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Maverick offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 256,000 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

These models come from different providers — Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Meta (via Together AI), switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 4 Maverick would save you roughly $1,366.50/month compared to Mistral Medium 3.5. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Llama 4 Maverick charges $0.85/1M output tokens vs $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Maverick has the edge here at $0.85/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when:

  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Llama 4 Maverick

  • Input pricing: $0.27/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.85/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Mistral Medium 3.5

  • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $7.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 256,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Llama 4 Maverick
  • Higher output cost than Llama 4 Maverick
  • Smaller context window than Llama 4 Maverick

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 4 Maverick (Meta (via Together AI))

Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI)

Start using Llama 4 Maverick today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Start using Mistral Medium 3.5 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for input tokens at $0.27 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5 — that's 82% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Medium 3.5?
Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 744,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Maverick.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Maverick is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 256,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Maverick for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Maverick for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 4 Maverick costs about $2.085/month and Mistral Medium 3.5 costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick has lower combined input + output rates ($0.27 in, $0.85 out) vs Mistral Medium 3.5.
Where can I compare Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Meta (via Together AI) vs Mistral AI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.