Skip to main content

Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare Meta (via Together AI) and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Maverick
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Scout

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 4 Maverick

Per Request:$0.000695
Daily:$0.0695
Monthly:$2.085
Yearly:$25.3675

Llama 4 Scout

Per Request:$0.000230
Daily:$0.023
Monthly:$0.69
Yearly:$8.395

Cost Differences

$0.000465
Per Request
$0.0465
Daily
$1.395
Monthly
$16.9725
Yearly

Llama 4 Scout costs less than Llama 4 Maverick

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 MaverickLlama 4 Scout
ProviderMeta (via Together AI)Meta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.27/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Output Price$0.85/1M tokens$0.30/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens10,000,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipefficient
Capabilities
textvisioncode
textvisioncode
Release Date4/5/20254/5/2025

Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 4 Maverick and Llama 4 Scout depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.08/1M input tokens70% cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Scout offers a significantly larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens vs 1,000,000 for Llama 4 Maverick.

These models target different tiers: Llama 4 Maverick is a flagship model while Llama 4 Scout is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 4 Maverick is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Llama 4 Scout offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Llama 4 Maverick charges $0.85/1M output tokens vs $0.30 for Llama 4 Scout. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Scout has the edge here at $0.30/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 4 Maverick (Meta (via Together AI))

Llama 4 Scout (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Llama 4 Maverick today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Start using Llama 4 Scout today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input tokens at $0.08 per million tokens vs $0.27 for Llama 4 Maverick — that's 70% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Llama 4 Maverick and Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens while Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens — a difference of 9,000,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Scout.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Scout is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10,000,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Scout for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Scout for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 4 Maverick costs about $2.085/month and Llama 4 Scout costs about $0.69/month. Overall, Llama 4 Scout has lower combined input + output rates ($0.08 in, $0.30 out) vs Llama 4 Maverick.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles