Skip to main content

Llama 3.3 70B vs o3

Compare Meta (via Together AI) and OpenAI AI models

Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
OpenAI
o3

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 3.3 70B

Per Request:$0.001320
Daily:$0.132
Monthly:$3.96
Yearly:$48.18

o3

Per Request:$0.006000
Daily:$0.60
Monthly:$18.00
Yearly:$219.00

Cost Differences

+$0.004680
Per Request
+$0.468
Daily
+$14.04
Monthly
+$170.82
Yearly

o3 costs more than Llama 3.3 70B

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 70Bo3
ProviderMeta (via Together AI)OpenAI
Input Price$0.88/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$0.88/1M tokens$8.00/1M tokens
Context Window131,072 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output4,096 tokens131,072 tokens
Categorystandardreasoning
Capabilities
textcode
textreasoningvisioncode
Release Date12/6/20244/16/2025

Llama 3.3 70B vs o3: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 3.3 70B and o3 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.3 70B is the more affordable option at $0.88/1M input tokens56% cheaper than o3. Meanwhile, o3 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Llama 3.3 70B.

These models come from different providers — Meta (via Together AI) and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Meta (via Together AI), switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Llama 3.3 70B is a standard model while o3 is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o3 targets more demanding workloads, while Llama 3.3 70B provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Llama 3.3 70B charges $0.88/1M output tokens vs $8.00 for o3. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.3 70B has the edge here at $0.88/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: o3 supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.3 70B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 3.3 70B when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Choose o3 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning, vision)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 3.3 70B (Meta (via Together AI))

o3 (OpenAI)

Start using Llama 3.3 70B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Start using o3 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B or o3?
Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.88 per million tokens vs $2.00 for o3 — that's 56% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Llama 3.3 70B and o3?
Llama 3.3 70B supports 131,072 tokens while o3 supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 868,928 tokens in favor of o3.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.3 70B is the lower-cost option, while o3 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Choose Llama 3.3 70B for budget sensitivity or o3 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 3.3 70B costs about $3.96/month and o3 costs about $18.00/month. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.88 in, $0.88 out) vs o3.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles