Skip to main content

Llama 3.3 70B vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare Meta (via Together AI) and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Scout

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 3.3 70B

Per Request:$0.001320
Daily:$0.132
Monthly:$3.96
Yearly:$48.18

Llama 4 Scout

Per Request:$0.000230
Daily:$0.023
Monthly:$0.69
Yearly:$8.395

Cost Differences

$0.001090
Per Request
$0.109
Daily
$3.27
Monthly
$39.785
Yearly

Llama 4 Scout costs less than Llama 3.3 70B

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 70BLlama 4 Scout
ProviderMeta (via Together AI)Meta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.88/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Output Price$0.88/1M tokens$0.30/1M tokens
Context Window131,072 tokens10,000,000 tokens
Max Output4,096 tokens32,768 tokens
Categorystandardefficient
Capabilities
textcode
textvisioncode
Release Date12/6/20244/5/2025

Llama 3.3 70B vs Llama 4 Scout: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 3.3 70B and Llama 4 Scout depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.08/1M input tokens91% cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Scout offers a significantly larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Llama 3.3 70B.

These models target different tiers: Llama 3.3 70B is a standard model while Llama 4 Scout is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 4 Scout targets more demanding workloads, while Llama 3.3 70B provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Llama 3.3 70B charges $0.88/1M output tokens vs $0.30 for Llama 4 Scout. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Scout has the edge here at $0.30/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Llama 4 Scout supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.3 70B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 3.3 70B when:

  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 3.3 70B (Meta (via Together AI))

Llama 4 Scout (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Llama 3.3 70B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Start using Llama 4 Scout today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input tokens at $0.08 per million tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.3 70B — that's 91% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Llama 3.3 70B and Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 3.3 70B supports 131,072 tokens while Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens — a difference of 9,868,928 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Scout.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Scout is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10,000,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Scout for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Scout for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 3.3 70B costs about $3.96/month and Llama 4 Scout costs about $0.69/month. Overall, Llama 4 Scout has lower combined input + output rates ($0.08 in, $0.30 out) vs Llama 3.3 70B.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles