Skip to main content

Llama 3.1 8B vs Mistral Large 3

Compare Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI AI models

Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 3.1 8B

Per Request:$0.000270
Daily:$0.027
Monthly:$0.81
Yearly:$9.855

Mistral Large 3

Per Request:$0.001250
Daily:$0.125
Monthly:$3.75
Yearly:$45.625

Cost Differences

+$0.000980
Per Request
+$0.098
Daily
+$2.94
Monthly
+$35.77
Yearly

Mistral Large 3 costs more than Llama 3.1 8B

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 8BMistral Large 3
ProviderMeta (via Together AI)Mistral AI
Input Price$0.18/1M tokens$0.50/1M tokens
Output Price$0.18/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryefficientflagship
Capabilities
textcode
textcodereasoning
Release Date7/23/202412/2/2025

Llama 3.1 8B vs Mistral Large 3: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 3.1 8B and Mistral Large 3 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 8B is the more affordable option at $0.18/1M input tokens64% cheaper than Mistral Large 3. Meanwhile, Mistral Large 3 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 8B.

These models come from different providers — Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Meta (via Together AI), switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Llama 3.1 8B is a efficient model while Mistral Large 3 is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Mistral Large 3 targets more demanding workloads, while Llama 3.1 8B provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Llama 3.1 8B charges $0.18/1M output tokens vs $1.50 for Mistral Large 3. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 8B has the edge here at $0.18/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 3.1 8B when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Mistral Large 3 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 3.1 8B (Meta (via Together AI))

Mistral Large 3 (Mistral AI)

Start using Llama 3.1 8B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Start using Mistral Large 3 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B or Mistral Large 3?
Llama 3.1 8B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.18 per million tokens vs $0.50 for Mistral Large 3 — that's 64% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Llama 3.1 8B and Mistral Large 3?
Llama 3.1 8B supports 128,000 tokens while Mistral Large 3 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of Mistral Large 3.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.1 8B is the lower-cost option, while Mistral Large 3 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 8B for budget sensitivity or Mistral Large 3 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 3.1 8B costs about $0.81/month and Mistral Large 3 costs about $3.75/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 8B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.18 in, $0.18 out) vs Mistral Large 3.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles