Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 3.3 70B
Pricing verdict: Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 3.3 70B: pricing is a tie at $0.88/M input and $0.88/M output. The real choice is context: Llama 3.3 70B is better for long-context tasks (131,072 tokens vs 128,000).
Direct answer: pricing is a tie. Choose Llama 3.3 70B for the larger 131.1K context window, or pick Llama 3.1 70B if 128K is already enough for your workload.
Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Llama 3.1 70B
Llama 3.3 70B
Cost Differences
Both models cost the same at the default workload.
Quick Recommendation
Direct API pricing is a tie at the default workload: both land around $3.96/month. Pick Llama 3.3 70B if you need the larger 131.1K context window; otherwise choose the model that better fits your workflow.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Llama 3.1 70B | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta (via Together AI) | Meta (via Together AI) |
| Input Price | $0.88/1M tokens | $0.88/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.88/1M tokens | $0.88/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max Output | 32,768 tokens | 4,096 tokens |
| Category | balanced | standard |
| Capabilities | textcode | textcode |
| Release Date | 7/23/2024 | 12/6/2024 |
Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 3.3 70B: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Llama 3.1 70B and Llama 3.3 70B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Both models cost the same on input and output tokens, so raw price is a tie. Meanwhile, Llama 3.3 70B offers a significantly larger context window at 131,072 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 70B.
These models target different tiers: Llama 3.1 70B is a balanced model while Llama 3.3 70B is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.3 70B targets more demanding workloads, while Llama 3.1 70B provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. Llama 3.1 70B charges $0.88/1M output tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.3 70B.
Best Use Cases
Choose Llama 3.1 70B when:
- • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
- • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
Choose Llama 3.3 70B when:
- • You need a larger context window (131,072 tokens)
- • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
Pros and Caveats at a Glance
Llama 3.1 70B
- • Input pricing: $0.88/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $0.88/M tokens
- • Context window: 128,000 tokens
- • Max output: 32,768 tokens
Watch out for
- • Smaller context window than Llama 3.3 70B
Llama 3.3 70B
- • Input pricing: $0.88/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $0.88/M tokens
- • Context window: 131,072 tokens
- • Max output: 4,096 tokens
Watch out for
- • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Llama 3.1 70B (Meta (via Together AI))
Llama 3.3 70B (Meta (via Together AI))
Start using Llama 3.1 70B today
Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI) →Start using Llama 3.3 70B today
Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI) →Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B or Llama 3.3 70B?▼
What is the context window difference between Llama 3.1 70B and Llama 3.3 70B?▼
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.