Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 3.3 70B

Compare Meta (via Together AI) and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

Meta (via Together AI)

Llama 3.1 70B

Meta (via Together AI)

Llama 3.3 70B

Try Meta (via Together AI) →

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 3.1 70B

Per Request:$0.001320

Daily:$0.132

Monthly:$3.96

Yearly:$48.18

Llama 3.3 70B

Per Request:$0.001320

Daily:$0.132

Monthly:$3.96

Yearly:$48.18

Cost Differences

$0.00

Per Request

$0.00

Daily

$0.00

Monthly

$0.00

Yearly

Llama 3.3 70B costs less than Llama 3.1 70B

Feature Comparison

Feature	Llama 3.1 70B	Llama 3.3 70B
Provider	Meta (via Together AI)	Meta (via Together AI)
Input Price	$0.88/1M tokens	$0.88/1M tokens
Output Price	$0.88/1M tokens	$0.88/1M tokens
Context Window	128,000 tokens	131,072 tokens
Max Output	32,768 tokens	4,096 tokens
Category	balanced	standard
Capabilities	textcode	textcode
Release Date	7/23/2024	12/6/2024

Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 3.3 70B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 3.1 70B and Llama 3.3 70B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.3 70B is the more affordable option at $0.88/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, Llama 3.3 70B offers a significantly larger context window at 131,072 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 70B.

These models target different tiers: Llama 3.1 70B is a balanced model while Llama 3.3 70B is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.3 70B targets more demanding workloads, while Llama 3.1 70B provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Llama 3.1 70B charges $0.88/1M output tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.3 70B.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 3.1 70B when:

• You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
• You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.3 70B when:

• You need a larger context window (131,072 tokens)
• You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 3.1 70B (Meta (via Together AI))

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

Llama 3.3 70B (Meta (via Together AI))

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

Start using Llama 3.1 70B today

Start using Llama 3.3 70B today

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B or Llama 3.3 70B?▼

Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.88 per million tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.1 70B.

What is the context window difference between Llama 3.1 70B and Llama 3.3 70B?▼

Llama 3.1 70B supports 128,000 tokens while Llama 3.3 70B supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 3,072 tokens in favor of Llama 3.3 70B.

Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼

Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.3 70B is the lower-cost option, while Llama 3.3 70B offers a larger context window (131,072 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.3 70B for budget sensitivity or Llama 3.3 70B for longer context tasks.

Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼

At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 3.1 70B costs about $3.96/month and Llama 3.3 70B costs about $3.96/month. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.88 in, $0.88 out) vs Llama 3.1 70B.