Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 3.1 8B

Compare Meta (via Together AI) and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

Meta (via Together AI)

Llama 3.1 70B

Meta (via Together AI)

Llama 3.1 8B

Try Meta (via Together AI) →

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 3.1 70B

Per Request:$0.001320

Daily:$0.132

Monthly:$3.96

Yearly:$48.18

Llama 3.1 8B

Per Request:$0.000270

Daily:$0.027

Monthly:$0.81

Yearly:$9.855

Cost Differences

$0.001050

Per Request

$0.105

Daily

$3.15

Monthly

$38.325

Yearly

Llama 3.1 8B costs less than Llama 3.1 70B

Feature Comparison

Feature	Llama 3.1 70B	Llama 3.1 8B
Provider	Meta (via Together AI)	Meta (via Together AI)
Input Price	$0.88/1M tokens	$0.18/1M tokens
Output Price	$0.88/1M tokens	$0.18/1M tokens
Context Window	128,000 tokens	128,000 tokens
Max Output	32,768 tokens	32,768 tokens
Category	balanced	efficient
Capabilities	textcode	textcode
Release Date	7/23/2024	7/23/2024

Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 3.1 8B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 3.1 70B and Llama 3.1 8B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 8B is the more affordable option at $0.18/1M input tokens — 80% cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B.

These models target different tiers: Llama 3.1 70B is a balanced model while Llama 3.1 8B is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.1 8B targets more demanding workloads, while Llama 3.1 70B provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Llama 3.1 70B charges $0.88/1M output tokens vs $0.18 for Llama 3.1 8B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 8B has the edge here at $0.18/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 3.1 70B when:

• You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.1 8B when:

• Budget is a primary concern
• You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
• You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 3.1 70B (Meta (via Together AI))

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

Llama 3.1 8B (Meta (via Together AI))

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

Start using Llama 3.1 70B today

Start using Llama 3.1 8B today

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B or Llama 3.1 8B?▼

Llama 3.1 8B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.18 per million tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.1 70B — that's 80% savings on input costs.

What is the context window difference between Llama 3.1 70B and Llama 3.1 8B?▼

Llama 3.1 70B supports 128,000 tokens while Llama 3.1 8B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Llama 3.1 70B.

Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼

Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.1 8B is the lower-cost option, while Llama 3.1 70B offers a larger context window (128,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 8B for budget sensitivity or Llama 3.1 70B for longer context tasks.

Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼

At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 3.1 70B costs about $3.96/month and Llama 3.1 8B costs about $0.81/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 8B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.18 in, $0.18 out) vs Llama 3.1 70B.