Skip to main content

Llama 3.1 405B vs o1 Pro

Llama 3.1 405B vs o1 Pro: Llama 3.1 405B is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($3.50/M vs $150.00/M input tokens), while o1 Pro is better for long-context tasks (200,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 3.1 405B for lower token spend and choose o1 Pro when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
OpenAI
o1 Pro

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 3.1 405B

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

o1 Pro

Per Request:$0.45
Daily:$45.00
Monthly:$1,350.00
Yearly:$16,425.00

Cost Differences

+$0.44475
Per Request
+$44.475
Daily
+$1,334.25
Monthly
+$16,233.375
Yearly

o1 Pro costs more than Llama 3.1 405B

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Llama 3.1 405B. At the default workload, Llama 3.1 405B saves about $1,334.25/month ($16,233.375/year) versus o1 Pro.

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405Bo1 Pro
ProviderMeta (via Together AI)OpenAI
Input Price$3.50/1M tokens$150.00/1M tokens
Output Price$3.50/1M tokens$600.00/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens100,000 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textvisioncodereasoning
Release Date7/23/202412/17/2024

Llama 3.1 405B vs o1 Pro: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 3.1 405B and o1 Pro depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 405B is the more affordable option at $3.50/1M input tokens98% cheaper than o1 Pro. Meanwhile, o1 Pro offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 405B.

These models come from different providers — Meta (via Together AI) and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Meta (via Together AI), switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 3.1 405B would save you roughly $133,425.00/month compared to o1 Pro. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Llama 3.1 405B charges $3.50/1M output tokens vs $600.00 for o1 Pro. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 405B has the edge here at $3.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: o1 Pro supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.1 405B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 3.1 405B when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Choose o1 Pro when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 100,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Llama 3.1 405B

  • Input pricing: $3.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $3.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than o1 Pro

o1 Pro

  • Input pricing: $150.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $600.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 200,000 tokens
  • Max output: 100,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Llama 3.1 405B
  • Higher output cost than Llama 3.1 405B

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 3.1 405B (Meta (via Together AI))

o1 Pro (OpenAI)

Start using Llama 3.1 405B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Start using o1 Pro today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 405B or o1 Pro?
Llama 3.1 405B is cheaper for input tokens at $3.50 per million tokens vs $150.00 for o1 Pro — that's 98% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Llama 3.1 405B and o1 Pro?
Llama 3.1 405B supports 128,000 tokens while o1 Pro supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of o1 Pro.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Llama 3.1 405B is the lower-cost option, while o1 Pro offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 405B for budget sensitivity or o1 Pro for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 3.1 405B costs about $15.75/month and o1 Pro costs about $1,350.00/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B has lower combined input + output rates ($3.50 in, $3.50 out) vs o1 Pro.
Where can I compare Meta (via Together AI) and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Meta (via Together AI) vs OpenAI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.