Skip to main content

Llama 3.1 405B vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Llama 3.1 405B vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($1.50/M vs $3.50/M input tokens), while Mistral Medium 3.5 is better for long-context tasks (256,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Mistral Medium 3.5 for lower token spend and choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 3.1 405B

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Mistral Medium 3.5

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

$0.000000
Per Request
$0.000000
Daily
$0.000000
Monthly
$0.000000
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less than Llama 3.1 405B

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Mistral Medium 3.5. At the default workload, Mistral Medium 3.5 saves about $0.000000/month ($0.000000/year) versus Llama 3.1 405B.

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405BMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderMeta (via Together AI)Mistral AI
Input Price$3.50/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Output Price$3.50/1M tokens$7.50/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textvisioncodereasoning
Release Date7/23/20244/29/2026

Llama 3.1 405B vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 3.1 405B and Mistral Medium 3.5 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 405B is the more affordable option at $3.50/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, Mistral Medium 3.5 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 405B.

These models come from different providers — Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Meta (via Together AI), switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 3.1 405B would save you roughly $0.000000/month compared to Mistral Medium 3.5. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Llama 3.1 405B charges $3.50/1M output tokens vs $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 405B has the edge here at $3.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Mistral Medium 3.5 supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.1 405B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 3.1 405B when:

  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Llama 3.1 405B

  • Input pricing: $3.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $3.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Mistral Medium 3.5
  • Smaller context window than Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5

  • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $7.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 256,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher output cost than Llama 3.1 405B

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 3.1 405B (Meta (via Together AI))

Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI)

Start using Llama 3.1 405B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Start using Mistral Medium 3.5 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 405B or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Llama 3.1 405B is cheaper for input tokens at $3.50 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
What is the context window difference between Llama 3.1 405B and Mistral Medium 3.5?
Llama 3.1 405B supports 128,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of Mistral Medium 3.5.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Llama 3.1 405B is the lower-cost option, while Mistral Medium 3.5 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 405B for budget sensitivity or Mistral Medium 3.5 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 3.1 405B costs about $15.75/month and Mistral Medium 3.5 costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B has lower combined input + output rates ($3.50 in, $3.50 out) vs Mistral Medium 3.5.
Where can I compare Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Meta (via Together AI) vs Mistral AI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.