Skip to main content

Llama 3.1 405B vs Mistral Large 3

Compare Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI AI models

Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 3.1 405B

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Mistral Large 3

Per Request:$0.001250
Daily:$0.125
Monthly:$3.75
Yearly:$45.625

Cost Differences

$0.004000
Per Request
$0.40
Daily
$12.00
Monthly
$146.00
Yearly

Mistral Large 3 costs less than Llama 3.1 405B

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405BMistral Large 3
ProviderMeta (via Together AI)Mistral AI
Input Price$3.50/1M tokens$0.50/1M tokens
Output Price$3.50/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textcodereasoning
Release Date7/23/202412/2/2025

Llama 3.1 405B vs Mistral Large 3: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 3.1 405B and Mistral Large 3 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Large 3 is the more affordable option at $0.50/1M input tokens86% cheaper than Llama 3.1 405B. Meanwhile, Mistral Large 3 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 405B.

These models come from different providers — Meta (via Together AI) and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Meta (via Together AI), switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Mistral Large 3 would save you roughly $1,200.00/month compared to Llama 3.1 405B. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Llama 3.1 405B charges $3.50/1M output tokens vs $1.50 for Mistral Large 3. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Large 3 has the edge here at $1.50/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 3.1 405B when:

  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Large 3 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 3.1 405B (Meta (via Together AI))

Mistral Large 3 (Mistral AI)

Start using Llama 3.1 405B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Start using Mistral Large 3 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 405B or Mistral Large 3?
Mistral Large 3 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.50 per million tokens vs $3.50 for Llama 3.1 405B — that's 86% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Llama 3.1 405B and Mistral Large 3?
Llama 3.1 405B supports 128,000 tokens while Mistral Large 3 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of Mistral Large 3.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Mistral Large 3 is the lower-cost option, while Mistral Large 3 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Mistral Large 3 for budget sensitivity or Mistral Large 3 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 3.1 405B costs about $15.75/month and Mistral Large 3 costs about $3.75/month. Overall, Mistral Large 3 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.50 in, $1.50 out) vs Llama 3.1 405B.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles