Skip to main content

Llama 3.1 405B vs Llama 4 Maverick

Compare Meta (via Together AI) and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Maverick

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Llama 3.1 405B

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Llama 4 Maverick

Per Request:$0.000695
Daily:$0.0695
Monthly:$2.085
Yearly:$25.3675

Cost Differences

$0.004555
Per Request
$0.4555
Daily
$13.665
Monthly
$166.2575
Yearly

Llama 4 Maverick costs less than Llama 3.1 405B

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405BLlama 4 Maverick
ProviderMeta (via Together AI)Meta (via Together AI)
Input Price$3.50/1M tokens$0.27/1M tokens
Output Price$3.50/1M tokens$0.85/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textvisioncode
Release Date7/23/20244/5/2025

Llama 3.1 405B vs Llama 4 Maverick: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Llama 3.1 405B and Llama 4 Maverick depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.27/1M input tokens92% cheaper than Llama 3.1 405B. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Maverick offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 405B.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 4 Maverick would save you roughly $1,366.50/month compared to Llama 3.1 405B. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Llama 3.1 405B charges $3.50/1M output tokens vs $0.85 for Llama 4 Maverick. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Maverick has the edge here at $0.85/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Llama 4 Maverick supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.1 405B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Llama 3.1 405B when:

  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Llama 3.1 405B (Meta (via Together AI))

Llama 4 Maverick (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Llama 3.1 405B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Start using Llama 4 Maverick today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for input tokens at $0.27 per million tokens vs $3.50 for Llama 3.1 405B — that's 92% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Llama 3.1 405B and Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 3.1 405B supports 128,000 tokens while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 872,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Maverick.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Maverick is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Maverick for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Maverick for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Llama 3.1 405B costs about $15.75/month and Llama 4 Maverick costs about $2.085/month. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick has lower combined input + output rates ($0.27 in, $0.85 out) vs Llama 3.1 405B.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles