Grok Code Fast 1 vs Voxtral Small
Pricing verdict: Grok Code Fast 1 vs Voxtral Small: Voxtral Small is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.10/M vs $0.20/M input tokens), while Grok Code Fast 1 is better for long-context tasks (256,000 tokens).
Direct answer: choose Voxtral Small for lower token spend and choose Grok Code Fast 1 when your workload needs longer context.
Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Grok Code Fast 1
Voxtral Small
Cost Differences
Voxtral Small costs less than Grok Code Fast 1
Quick Recommendation
Winner for direct API pricing: Voxtral Small. At the default workload, Voxtral Small saves about $1.95/month ($23.725/year) versus Grok Code Fast 1.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Code Fast 1 | Voxtral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.20/1M tokens | $0.10/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $1.50/1M tokens | $0.40/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 256,000 tokens | 32,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 32,768 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Category | standard | efficient |
| Capabilities | textcodereasoning | textaudiotranscription |
| Release Date | 2/1/2026 | 7/15/2026 |
Grok Code Fast 1 vs Voxtral Small: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Grok Code Fast 1 and Voxtral Small depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Voxtral Small is the more affordable option at $0.10/1M input tokens — 50% cheaper than Grok Code Fast 1. Meanwhile, Grok Code Fast 1 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 32,000 for Voxtral Small.
These models come from different providers — xAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
These models target different tiers: Grok Code Fast 1 is a standard model while Voxtral Small is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Voxtral Small targets more demanding workloads, while Grok Code Fast 1 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. Grok Code Fast 1 charges $1.50/1M output tokens vs $0.40 for Voxtral Small. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Voxtral Small has the edge here at $0.40/1M output tokens.
Best Use Cases
Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:
- • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
- • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
- • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem
Choose Voxtral Small when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Pros and Caveats at a Glance
Grok Code Fast 1
- • Input pricing: $0.20/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $1.50/M tokens
- • Context window: 256,000 tokens
- • Max output: 32,768 tokens
Watch out for
- • Higher input cost than Voxtral Small
- • Higher output cost than Voxtral Small
Voxtral Small
- • Input pricing: $0.10/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $0.40/M tokens
- • Context window: 32,000 tokens
- • Max output: 8,192 tokens
Watch out for
- • Smaller context window than Grok Code Fast 1
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)
Voxtral Small (Mistral AI)
Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today
Sign Up for xAI →Start using Voxtral Small today
Sign Up for Mistral AI →Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Grok Code Fast 1 or Voxtral Small?▼
What is the context window difference between Grok Code Fast 1 and Voxtral Small?▼
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼
Where can I compare xAI and Mistral AI API pricing beyond this model matchup?▼
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.