Grok Code Fast 1 vs o3 Deep Research
Compare xAI and OpenAI AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Grok Code Fast 1
o3 Deep Research
Cost Differences
o3 Deep Research costs more than Grok Code Fast 1
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Code Fast 1 | o3 Deep Research |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | OpenAI |
| Input Price | $0.20/1M tokens | $10.00/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $1.50/1M tokens | $40.00/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 256,000 tokens | 200,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 32,768 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Category | standard | reasoning |
| Capabilities | textcodereasoning | textreasoningvisioncode |
| Release Date | 2/1/2026 | 6/26/2025 |
Grok Code Fast 1 vs o3 Deep Research: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Grok Code Fast 1 and o3 Deep Research depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok Code Fast 1 is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens — 98% cheaper than o3 Deep Research. Meanwhile, Grok Code Fast 1 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 200,000 for o3 Deep Research.
These models come from different providers — xAI and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
These models target different tiers: Grok Code Fast 1 is a standard model while o3 Deep Research is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o3 Deep Research targets more demanding workloads, while Grok Code Fast 1 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. Grok Code Fast 1 charges $1.50/1M output tokens vs $40.00 for o3 Deep Research. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok Code Fast 1 has the edge here at $1.50/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: o3 Deep Research supports vision (image inputs) while Grok Code Fast 1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.
Best Use Cases
Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
- • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem
Choose o3 Deep Research when:
- • You need more capabilities (vision)
- • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)
o3 Deep Research (OpenAI)
Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today
Sign Up for xAI →Start using o3 Deep Research today
Sign Up for OpenAI →