Skip to main content

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Pricing verdict: Grok Code Fast 1 vs Muse Spark 1.2: Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.20/M vs $1.25/M input tokens), while Muse Spark 1.2 is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Grok Code Fast 1 for lower token spend and choose Muse Spark 1.2 when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Muse Spark 1.2

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok Code Fast 1

Per Request:$0.000950
Daily:$0.095
Monthly:$2.85
Yearly:$34.675

Muse Spark 1.2

Per Request:$0.003375
Daily:$0.3375
Monthly:$10.125
Yearly:$123.1875

Cost Differences

+$0.002425
Per Request
+$0.2425
Daily
+$7.275
Monthly
+$88.5125
Yearly

Muse Spark 1.2 costs more than Grok Code Fast 1

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Grok Code Fast 1. At the default workload, Grok Code Fast 1 saves about $7.275/month ($88.5125/year) versus Muse Spark 1.2.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok Code Fast 1Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderxAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.20/1M tokens$1.25/1M tokens
Output Price$1.50/1M tokens$4.25/1M tokens
Context Window256,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens131,072 tokens
Categorystandardcoding
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textvisionaudiovideocodereasoning
Release Date2/1/20268/5/2026

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Muse Spark 1.2: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok Code Fast 1 and Muse Spark 1.2 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok Code Fast 1 is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens — 84% cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2. Meanwhile, Muse Spark 1.2 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 256,000 for Grok Code Fast 1.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Grok Code Fast 1 is a standard model while Muse Spark 1.2 is coding. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Muse Spark 1.2 targets more demanding workloads, while Grok Code Fast 1 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Grok Code Fast 1 charges $1.50/1M output tokens vs $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.2. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok Code Fast 1 has the edge here at $1.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Muse Spark 1.2 supports vision (image inputs) while Grok Code Fast 1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Choose Muse Spark 1.2 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Grok Code Fast 1

  • Input pricing: $0.20/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 256,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2

  • Input pricing: $1.25/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.25/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 131,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Grok Code Fast 1
  • Higher output cost than Grok Code Fast 1

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)

Muse Spark 1.2 (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Muse Spark 1.2 today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok Code Fast 1 or Muse Spark 1.2?
Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $1.25 for Muse Spark 1.2 — that's 84% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Grok Code Fast 1 and Muse Spark 1.2?
Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256,000 tokens while Muse Spark 1.2 supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 744,000 tokens in favor of Muse Spark 1.2.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Grok Code Fast 1 is the lower-cost option, while Muse Spark 1.2 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 256,000 tokens). Choose Grok Code Fast 1 for budget sensitivity or Muse Spark 1.2 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok Code Fast 1 costs about $2.85/month and Muse Spark 1.2 costs about $10.125/month. Overall, Grok Code Fast 1 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $1.50 out) vs Muse Spark 1.2.
Where can I compare xAI and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the xAI vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.