Grok Code Fast 1 vs Mistral Small 4
Compare xAI and Mistral AI AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Grok Code Fast 1
Mistral Small 4
Cost Differences
Mistral Small 4 costs less than Grok Code Fast 1
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Code Fast 1 | Mistral Small 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.20/1M tokens | $0.15/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $1.50/1M tokens | $0.60/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 256,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 32,768 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Category | standard | efficient |
| Capabilities | textcodereasoning | textvisioncodereasoning |
| Release Date | 2/1/2026 | 3/18/2026 |
Grok Code Fast 1 vs Mistral Small 4: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Grok Code Fast 1 and Mistral Small 4 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Small 4 is the more affordable option at $0.15/1M input tokens — 25% cheaper than Grok Code Fast 1. Meanwhile, Grok Code Fast 1 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Mistral Small 4.
These models come from different providers — xAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
These models target different tiers: Grok Code Fast 1 is a standard model while Mistral Small 4 is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Mistral Small 4 targets more demanding workloads, while Grok Code Fast 1 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. Grok Code Fast 1 charges $1.50/1M output tokens vs $0.60 for Mistral Small 4. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Small 4 has the edge here at $0.60/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Mistral Small 4 supports vision (image inputs) while Grok Code Fast 1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.
Best Use Cases
Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:
- • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
- • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
- • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem
Choose Mistral Small 4 when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need more capabilities (vision)
- • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)
Mistral Small 4 (Mistral AI)
Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today
Sign Up for xAI →Start using Mistral Small 4 today
Sign Up for Mistral AI →