Skip to main content

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Mistral Medium 3

Compare xAI and Mistral AI AI models

xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok Code Fast 1

Per Request:$0.000950
Daily:$0.095
Monthly:$2.85
Yearly:$34.675

Mistral Medium 3

Per Request:$0.001400
Daily:$0.14
Monthly:$4.20
Yearly:$51.10

Cost Differences

+$0.000450
Per Request
+$0.045
Daily
+$1.35
Monthly
+$16.425
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3 costs more than Grok Code Fast 1

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok Code Fast 1Mistral Medium 3
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Input Price$0.20/1M tokens$0.40/1M tokens
Output Price$1.50/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Context Window256,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens16,384 tokens
Categorystandardbalanced
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textcode
Release Date2/1/20265/7/2025

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Mistral Medium 3: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok Code Fast 1 and Mistral Medium 3 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok Code Fast 1 is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens50% cheaper than Mistral Medium 3. Meanwhile, Grok Code Fast 1 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Mistral Medium 3.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Grok Code Fast 1 is a standard model while Mistral Medium 3 is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Mistral Medium 3 targets more demanding workloads, while Grok Code Fast 1 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Grok Code Fast 1 charges $1.50/1M output tokens vs $2.00 for Mistral Medium 3. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok Code Fast 1 has the edge here at $1.50/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3 when:

  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)

Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral AI)

Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Mistral Medium 3 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok Code Fast 1 or Mistral Medium 3?
Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $0.40 for Mistral Medium 3 — that's 50% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Grok Code Fast 1 and Mistral Medium 3?
Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3 supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of Grok Code Fast 1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Grok Code Fast 1 is the lower-cost option, while Grok Code Fast 1 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Grok Code Fast 1 for budget sensitivity or Grok Code Fast 1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok Code Fast 1 costs about $2.85/month and Mistral Medium 3 costs about $4.20/month. Overall, Grok Code Fast 1 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $1.50 out) vs Mistral Medium 3.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles