Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 4 Scout
Compare xAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Grok Code Fast 1
Llama 4 Scout
Cost Differences
Llama 4 Scout costs less than Grok Code Fast 1
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Code Fast 1 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta (via Together AI) |
| Input Price | $0.20/1M tokens | $0.08/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $1.50/1M tokens | $0.30/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 256,000 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 32,768 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Category | standard | efficient |
| Capabilities | textcodereasoning | textvisioncode |
| Release Date | 2/1/2026 | 4/5/2025 |
Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 4 Scout: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 4 Scout depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.08/1M input tokens — 60% cheaper than Grok Code Fast 1. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Scout offers a significantly larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens vs 256,000 for Grok Code Fast 1.
These models come from different providers — xAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
These models target different tiers: Grok Code Fast 1 is a standard model while Llama 4 Scout is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 4 Scout targets more demanding workloads, while Grok Code Fast 1 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. Grok Code Fast 1 charges $1.50/1M output tokens vs $0.30 for Llama 4 Scout. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Scout has the edge here at $0.30/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Llama 4 Scout supports vision (image inputs) while Grok Code Fast 1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.
Best Use Cases
Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:
- • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem
Choose Llama 4 Scout when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
- • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)
Llama 4 Scout (Meta (via Together AI))
Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today
Sign Up for xAI →Start using Llama 4 Scout today
Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI) →