Skip to main content

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare xAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Scout

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok Code Fast 1

Per Request:$0.000950
Daily:$0.095
Monthly:$2.85
Yearly:$34.675

Llama 4 Scout

Per Request:$0.000230
Daily:$0.023
Monthly:$0.69
Yearly:$8.395

Cost Differences

$0.000720
Per Request
$0.072
Daily
$2.16
Monthly
$26.28
Yearly

Llama 4 Scout costs less than Grok Code Fast 1

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok Code Fast 1Llama 4 Scout
ProviderxAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.20/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Output Price$1.50/1M tokens$0.30/1M tokens
Context Window256,000 tokens10,000,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Categorystandardefficient
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textvisioncode
Release Date2/1/20264/5/2025

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 4 Scout: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 4 Scout depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.08/1M input tokens60% cheaper than Grok Code Fast 1. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Scout offers a significantly larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens vs 256,000 for Grok Code Fast 1.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Grok Code Fast 1 is a standard model while Llama 4 Scout is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 4 Scout targets more demanding workloads, while Grok Code Fast 1 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Grok Code Fast 1 charges $1.50/1M output tokens vs $0.30 for Llama 4 Scout. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Scout has the edge here at $0.30/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Llama 4 Scout supports vision (image inputs) while Grok Code Fast 1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:

  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)

Llama 4 Scout (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Llama 4 Scout today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok Code Fast 1 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input tokens at $0.08 per million tokens vs $0.20 for Grok Code Fast 1 — that's 60% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 4 Scout?
Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256,000 tokens while Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens — a difference of 9,744,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Scout.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Scout is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10,000,000 vs 256,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Scout for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Scout for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok Code Fast 1 costs about $2.85/month and Llama 4 Scout costs about $0.69/month. Overall, Llama 4 Scout has lower combined input + output rates ($0.08 in, $0.30 out) vs Grok Code Fast 1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles