Skip to main content

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 3.3 70B

Compare xAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.3 70B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok Code Fast 1

Per Request:$0.000950
Daily:$0.095
Monthly:$2.85
Yearly:$34.675

Llama 3.3 70B

Per Request:$0.001320
Daily:$0.132
Monthly:$3.96
Yearly:$48.18

Cost Differences

+$0.000370
Per Request
+$0.037
Daily
+$1.11
Monthly
+$13.505
Yearly

Llama 3.3 70B costs more than Grok Code Fast 1

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok Code Fast 1Llama 3.3 70B
ProviderxAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.20/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Output Price$1.50/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Context Window256,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens4,096 tokens
Categorystandardstandard
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textcode
Release Date2/1/202612/6/2024

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 3.3 70B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 3.3 70B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok Code Fast 1 is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens77% cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B. Meanwhile, Grok Code Fast 1 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Llama 3.3 70B.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the standard category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Grok Code Fast 1 would save you roughly $111.00/month compared to Llama 3.3 70B. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Grok Code Fast 1 charges $1.50/1M output tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.3 70B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok Code Fast 1 has the edge here at $1.50/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.3 70B when:

  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)

Llama 3.3 70B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Llama 3.3 70B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok Code Fast 1 or Llama 3.3 70B?
Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.3 70B — that's 77% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 3.3 70B?
Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256,000 tokens while Llama 3.3 70B supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 124,928 tokens in favor of Grok Code Fast 1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Grok Code Fast 1 is the lower-cost option, while Grok Code Fast 1 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Choose Grok Code Fast 1 for budget sensitivity or Grok Code Fast 1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok Code Fast 1 costs about $2.85/month and Llama 3.3 70B costs about $3.96/month. Overall, Grok Code Fast 1 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $1.50 out) vs Llama 3.3 70B.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles