Skip to main content

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 3.1 8B

Compare xAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 8B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok Code Fast 1

Per Request:$0.000950
Daily:$0.095
Monthly:$2.85
Yearly:$34.675

Llama 3.1 8B

Per Request:$0.000270
Daily:$0.027
Monthly:$0.81
Yearly:$9.855

Cost Differences

$0.000680
Per Request
$0.068
Daily
$2.04
Monthly
$24.82
Yearly

Llama 3.1 8B costs less than Grok Code Fast 1

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok Code Fast 1Llama 3.1 8B
ProviderxAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.20/1M tokens$0.18/1M tokens
Output Price$1.50/1M tokens$0.18/1M tokens
Context Window256,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Categorystandardefficient
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textcode
Release Date2/1/20267/23/2024

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 3.1 8B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 3.1 8B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 8B is the more affordable option at $0.18/1M input tokens10% cheaper than Grok Code Fast 1. Meanwhile, Grok Code Fast 1 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 8B.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Grok Code Fast 1 is a standard model while Llama 3.1 8B is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.1 8B targets more demanding workloads, while Grok Code Fast 1 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Grok Code Fast 1 charges $1.50/1M output tokens vs $0.18 for Llama 3.1 8B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 8B has the edge here at $0.18/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.1 8B when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)

Llama 3.1 8B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Llama 3.1 8B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok Code Fast 1 or Llama 3.1 8B?
Llama 3.1 8B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.18 per million tokens vs $0.20 for Grok Code Fast 1 — that's 10% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 3.1 8B?
Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256,000 tokens while Llama 3.1 8B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of Grok Code Fast 1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.1 8B is the lower-cost option, while Grok Code Fast 1 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 8B for budget sensitivity or Grok Code Fast 1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok Code Fast 1 costs about $2.85/month and Llama 3.1 8B costs about $0.81/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 8B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.18 in, $0.18 out) vs Grok Code Fast 1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles