Skip to main content

Grok 4 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare xAI and Mistral AI AI models

xAI
Grok 4
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok 4

Per Request:$0.0105
Daily:$1.05
Monthly:$31.50
Yearly:$383.25

Mistral Medium 3.1

Per Request:$0.001400
Daily:$0.14
Monthly:$4.20
Yearly:$51.10

Cost Differences

$0.009100
Per Request
$0.91
Daily
$27.30
Monthly
$332.15
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less than Grok 4

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok 4Mistral Medium 3.1
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Input Price$3.00/1M tokens$0.40/1M tokens
Output Price$15.00/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Context Window256,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens16,384 tokens
Categoryreasoningbalanced
Capabilities
textvisionreasoningcode
textcodereasoning
Release Date7/9/20258/1/2025

Grok 4 vs Mistral Medium 3.1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok 4 and Mistral Medium 3.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Medium 3.1 is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M input tokens87% cheaper than Grok 4. Meanwhile, Grok 4 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3.1.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Grok 4 is a reasoning model while Mistral Medium 3.1 is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Grok 4 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Mistral Medium 3.1 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Grok 4 charges $15.00/1M output tokens vs $2.00 for Mistral Medium 3.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Medium 3.1 has the edge here at $2.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Grok 4 supports vision (image inputs) while Mistral Medium 3.1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok 4 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok 4 (xAI)

Mistral Medium 3.1 (Mistral AI)

Start using Grok 4 today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Mistral Medium 3.1 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4 or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.40 per million tokens vs $3.00 for Grok 4 — that's 87% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Grok 4 and Mistral Medium 3.1?
Grok 4 supports 256,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.1 supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 124,928 tokens in favor of Grok 4.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Mistral Medium 3.1 is the lower-cost option, while Grok 4 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 for budget sensitivity or Grok 4 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok 4 costs about $31.50/month and Mistral Medium 3.1 costs about $4.20/month. Overall, Mistral Medium 3.1 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.40 in, $2.00 out) vs Grok 4.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles