Skip to main content

Grok 4.20 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Pricing verdict: Grok 4.20 vs Muse Spark 1.2: input pricing is tied at $1.25/M, Grok 4.20 is cheaper for output-heavy usage ($2.50/M output), and Grok 4.20 is better for long-context tasks (2,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: input pricing is tied. Choose Grok 4.20 for cheaper output and choose Grok 4.20 when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

xAI
Grok 4.20
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Muse Spark 1.2

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok 4.20

Per Request:$0.002500
Daily:$0.25
Monthly:$7.50
Yearly:$91.25

Muse Spark 1.2

Per Request:$0.003375
Daily:$0.3375
Monthly:$10.125
Yearly:$123.1875

Cost Differences

+$0.000875
Per Request
+$0.0875
Daily
+$2.625
Monthly
+$31.9375
Yearly

Muse Spark 1.2 costs more than Grok 4.20

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Grok 4.20. At the default workload, Grok 4.20 saves about $2.625/month ($31.9375/year) versus Muse Spark 1.2.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok 4.20Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderxAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$1.25/1M tokens$1.25/1M tokens
Output Price$2.50/1M tokens$4.25/1M tokens
Context Window2,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryreasoningcoding
Capabilities
textvisionreasoningcode
textvisionaudiovideocodereasoning
Release Date2/17/20268/5/2026

Grok 4.20 vs Muse Spark 1.2: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok 4.20 and Muse Spark 1.2 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Both models charge $1.25/1M input tokens, but Grok 4.20 is cheaper on output at $2.50/1M. Meanwhile, Grok 4.20 offers a significantly larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens vs 1,000,000 for Muse Spark 1.2.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Grok 4.20 is a reasoning model while Muse Spark 1.2 is coding. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Grok 4.20 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Muse Spark 1.2 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Grok 4.20 charges $2.50/1M output tokens vs $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.2. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok 4.20 has the edge here at $2.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok 4.20 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Choose Muse Spark 1.2 when:

  • • You need more capabilities (audio, video)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Grok 4.20

  • Input pricing: $1.25/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $2.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 2,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 131,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Muse Spark 1.2

  • Input pricing: $1.25/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.25/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 131,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher output cost than Grok 4.20
  • Smaller context window than Grok 4.20

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok 4.20 (xAI)

Muse Spark 1.2 (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Grok 4.20 today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Muse Spark 1.2 today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 or Muse Spark 1.2?
Input pricing is tied at $1.25 per million tokens. Grok 4.20 is cheaper on output at $2.50 vs $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.2, so it wins for output-heavy usage.
What is the context window difference between Grok 4.20 and Muse Spark 1.2?
Grok 4.20 supports 2,000,000 tokens while Muse Spark 1.2 supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 1,000,000 tokens in favor of Grok 4.20.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Grok 4.20 is the lower-cost option, while Grok 4.20 offers a larger context window (2,000,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose Grok 4.20 for budget sensitivity or Grok 4.20 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok 4.20 costs about $7.50/month and Muse Spark 1.2 costs about $10.125/month. Overall, Grok 4.20 has lower combined input + output rates ($1.25 in, $2.50 out) vs Muse Spark 1.2.
Where can I compare xAI and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the xAI vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.