Skip to main content

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Mistral Medium 3

Compare xAI and Mistral AI AI models

xAI
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok 4.1 Fast

Per Request:$0.000450
Daily:$0.045
Monthly:$1.35
Yearly:$16.425

Mistral Medium 3

Per Request:$0.001400
Daily:$0.14
Monthly:$4.20
Yearly:$51.10

Cost Differences

+$0.000950
Per Request
+$0.095
Daily
+$2.85
Monthly
+$34.675
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3 costs more than Grok 4.1 Fast

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok 4.1 FastMistral Medium 3
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Input Price$0.20/1M tokens$0.40/1M tokens
Output Price$0.50/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Context Window2,000,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens16,384 tokens
Categoryefficientbalanced
Capabilities
textreasoningcode
textcode
Release Date1/15/20265/7/2025

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Mistral Medium 3: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok 4.1 Fast and Mistral Medium 3 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok 4.1 Fast is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens50% cheaper than Mistral Medium 3. Meanwhile, Grok 4.1 Fast offers a significantly larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Mistral Medium 3.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Grok 4.1 Fast is a efficient model while Mistral Medium 3 is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Mistral Medium 3 targets more demanding workloads, while Grok 4.1 Fast provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Grok 4.1 Fast charges $0.50/1M output tokens vs $2.00 for Mistral Medium 3. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok 4.1 Fast has the edge here at $0.50/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok 4.1 Fast when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Mistral Medium 3 when:

  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok 4.1 Fast (xAI)

Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral AI)

Start using Grok 4.1 Fast today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Mistral Medium 3 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.1 Fast or Mistral Medium 3?
Grok 4.1 Fast is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $0.40 for Mistral Medium 3 — that's 50% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Grok 4.1 Fast and Mistral Medium 3?
Grok 4.1 Fast supports 2,000,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3 supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 1,872,000 tokens in favor of Grok 4.1 Fast.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Grok 4.1 Fast is the lower-cost option, while Grok 4.1 Fast offers a larger context window (2,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Grok 4.1 Fast for budget sensitivity or Grok 4.1 Fast for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok 4.1 Fast costs about $1.35/month and Mistral Medium 3 costs about $4.20/month. Overall, Grok 4.1 Fast has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $0.50 out) vs Mistral Medium 3.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles