Skip to main content

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Llama 4 Scout

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Llama 4 Scout: Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.08/M vs $0.20/M input tokens), while Llama 4 Scout is better for long-context tasks (10,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 4 Scout for lower token spend and choose Llama 4 Scout when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

xAI
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Scout

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok 4.1 Fast

Per Request:$0.000450
Daily:$0.045
Monthly:$1.35
Yearly:$16.425

Llama 4 Scout

Per Request:$0.000230
Daily:$0.023
Monthly:$0.69
Yearly:$8.395

Cost Differences

$0.000220
Per Request
$0.022
Daily
$0.66
Monthly
$8.03
Yearly

Llama 4 Scout costs less than Grok 4.1 Fast

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Llama 4 Scout. At the default workload, Llama 4 Scout saves about $0.66/month ($8.03/year) versus Grok 4.1 Fast.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok 4.1 FastLlama 4 Scout
ProviderxAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.20/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Output Price$0.50/1M tokens$0.30/1M tokens
Context Window2,000,000 tokens10,000,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
textreasoningcode
textvisioncode
Release Date1/15/20264/5/2025

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Llama 4 Scout: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok 4.1 Fast and Llama 4 Scout depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.08/1M input tokens60% cheaper than Grok 4.1 Fast. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Scout offers a significantly larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens vs 2,000,000 for Grok 4.1 Fast.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 4 Scout would save you roughly $66.00/month compared to Grok 4.1 Fast. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Grok 4.1 Fast charges $0.50/1M output tokens vs $0.30 for Llama 4 Scout. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Scout has the edge here at $0.30/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Llama 4 Scout supports vision (image inputs) while Grok 4.1 Fast is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok 4.1 Fast when:

  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Grok 4.1 Fast

  • Input pricing: $0.20/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 2,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 131,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Llama 4 Scout
  • Higher output cost than Llama 4 Scout
  • Smaller context window than Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout

  • Input pricing: $0.08/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.30/M tokens
  • Context window: 10,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok 4.1 Fast (xAI)

Llama 4 Scout (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Grok 4.1 Fast today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Llama 4 Scout today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.1 Fast or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input tokens at $0.08 per million tokens vs $0.20 for Grok 4.1 Fast — that's 60% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Grok 4.1 Fast and Llama 4 Scout?
Grok 4.1 Fast supports 2,000,000 tokens while Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens — a difference of 8,000,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Scout.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Scout is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10,000,000 vs 2,000,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Scout for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Scout for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok 4.1 Fast costs about $1.35/month and Llama 4 Scout costs about $0.69/month. Overall, Llama 4 Scout has lower combined input + output rates ($0.08 in, $0.30 out) vs Grok 4.1 Fast.
Where can I compare xAI and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the xAI vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.