Skip to main content

Grok 3 vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare xAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

xAI
Grok 3
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Scout

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok 3

Per Request:$0.0105
Daily:$1.05
Monthly:$31.50
Yearly:$383.25

Llama 4 Scout

Per Request:$0.000230
Daily:$0.023
Monthly:$0.69
Yearly:$8.395

Cost Differences

$0.01027
Per Request
$1.027
Daily
$30.81
Monthly
$374.855
Yearly

Llama 4 Scout costs less than Grok 3

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok 3Llama 4 Scout
ProviderxAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$3.00/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Output Price$15.00/1M tokens$0.30/1M tokens
Context Window131,072 tokens10,000,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipefficient
Capabilities
textvisionreasoningcode
textvisioncode
Release Date2/17/20254/5/2025

Grok 3 vs Llama 4 Scout: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok 3 and Llama 4 Scout depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.08/1M input tokens97% cheaper than Grok 3. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Scout offers a significantly larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Grok 3.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Grok 3 is a flagship model while Llama 4 Scout is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Grok 3 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Llama 4 Scout offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Grok 3 charges $15.00/1M output tokens vs $0.30 for Llama 4 Scout. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Scout has the edge here at $0.30/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok 3 when:

  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok 3 (xAI)

Llama 4 Scout (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Grok 3 today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Llama 4 Scout today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 3 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input tokens at $0.08 per million tokens vs $3.00 for Grok 3 — that's 97% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Grok 3 and Llama 4 Scout?
Grok 3 supports 131,072 tokens while Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens — a difference of 9,868,928 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Scout.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Scout is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10,000,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Scout for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Scout for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok 3 costs about $31.50/month and Llama 4 Scout costs about $0.69/month. Overall, Llama 4 Scout has lower combined input + output rates ($0.08 in, $0.30 out) vs Grok 3.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles