Grok 3 Mini vs Llama 4 Scout
Compare xAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Grok 3 Mini
Llama 4 Scout
Cost Differences
Llama 4 Scout costs less than Grok 3 Mini
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok 3 Mini | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta (via Together AI) |
| Input Price | $0.30/1M tokens | $0.08/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.50/1M tokens | $0.30/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 128,000 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 131,072 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Category | efficient | efficient |
| Capabilities | textreasoningcode | textvisioncode |
| Release Date | 2/17/2025 | 4/5/2025 |
Grok 3 Mini vs Llama 4 Scout: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Grok 3 Mini and Llama 4 Scout depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.08/1M input tokens — 73% cheaper than Grok 3 Mini. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Scout offers a significantly larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Grok 3 Mini.
These models come from different providers — xAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 4 Scout would save you roughly $96.00/month compared to Grok 3 Mini. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.
Output costs matter too. Grok 3 Mini charges $0.50/1M output tokens vs $0.30 for Llama 4 Scout. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Scout has the edge here at $0.30/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Llama 4 Scout supports vision (image inputs) while Grok 3 Mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.
Best Use Cases
Choose Grok 3 Mini when:
- • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
- • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Choose Llama 4 Scout when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
- • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Grok 3 Mini (xAI)
Llama 4 Scout (Meta (via Together AI))
Start using Grok 3 Mini today
Sign Up for xAI →Start using Llama 4 Scout today
Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI) →