Skip to main content

Grok 3 Mini vs Llama 3.3 70B

Compare xAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

xAI
Grok 3 Mini
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.3 70B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Grok 3 Mini

Per Request:$0.000550
Daily:$0.055
Monthly:$1.65
Yearly:$20.075

Llama 3.3 70B

Per Request:$0.001320
Daily:$0.132
Monthly:$3.96
Yearly:$48.18

Cost Differences

+$0.000770
Per Request
+$0.077
Daily
+$2.31
Monthly
+$28.105
Yearly

Llama 3.3 70B costs more than Grok 3 Mini

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok 3 MiniLlama 3.3 70B
ProviderxAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.30/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Output Price$0.50/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens4,096 tokens
Categoryefficientstandard
Capabilities
textreasoningcode
textcode
Release Date2/17/202512/6/2024

Grok 3 Mini vs Llama 3.3 70B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Grok 3 Mini and Llama 3.3 70B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok 3 Mini is the more affordable option at $0.30/1M input tokens66% cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B. Meanwhile, Llama 3.3 70B offers a significantly larger context window at 131,072 tokens vs 128,000 for Grok 3 Mini.

These models come from different providers — xAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Grok 3 Mini is a efficient model while Llama 3.3 70B is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.3 70B targets more demanding workloads, while Grok 3 Mini provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Grok 3 Mini charges $0.50/1M output tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.3 70B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok 3 Mini has the edge here at $0.50/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Grok 3 Mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Llama 3.3 70B when:

  • • You need a larger context window (131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Grok 3 Mini (xAI)

Llama 3.3 70B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Grok 3 Mini today

Sign Up for xAI

Start using Llama 3.3 70B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 3 Mini or Llama 3.3 70B?
Grok 3 Mini is cheaper for input tokens at $0.30 per million tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.3 70B — that's 66% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Grok 3 Mini and Llama 3.3 70B?
Grok 3 Mini supports 128,000 tokens while Llama 3.3 70B supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 3,072 tokens in favor of Llama 3.3 70B.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Grok 3 Mini is the lower-cost option, while Llama 3.3 70B offers a larger context window (131,072 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Grok 3 Mini for budget sensitivity or Llama 3.3 70B for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Grok 3 Mini costs about $1.65/month and Llama 3.3 70B costs about $3.96/month. Overall, Grok 3 Mini has lower combined input + output rates ($0.30 in, $0.50 out) vs Llama 3.3 70B.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles