Grok 3 Mini vs Llama 3.3 70B
Grok 3 Mini vs Llama 3.3 70B: Grok 3 Mini is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.30/M vs $0.88/M input tokens), while Llama 3.3 70B is better for long-context tasks (131,072 tokens).
Direct answer: choose Grok 3 Mini for lower token spend and choose Llama 3.3 70B when your workload needs longer context.
Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Grok 3 Mini
Llama 3.3 70B
Cost Differences
Llama 3.3 70B costs more than Grok 3 Mini
Quick Recommendation
Winner for direct API pricing: Grok 3 Mini. At the default workload, Grok 3 Mini saves about $2.31/month ($28.105/year) versus Llama 3.3 70B.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok 3 Mini | Llama 3.3 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta (via Together AI) |
| Input Price | $0.30/1M tokens | $0.88/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.50/1M tokens | $0.88/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max Output | 131,072 tokens | 4,096 tokens |
| Category | efficient | standard |
| Capabilities | textreasoningcode | textcode |
| Release Date | 2/17/2025 | 12/6/2024 |
Grok 3 Mini vs Llama 3.3 70B: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Grok 3 Mini and Llama 3.3 70B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok 3 Mini is the more affordable option at $0.30/1M input tokens — 66% cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B. Meanwhile, Llama 3.3 70B offers a significantly larger context window at 131,072 tokens vs 128,000 for Grok 3 Mini.
These models come from different providers — xAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with xAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
These models target different tiers: Grok 3 Mini is a efficient model while Llama 3.3 70B is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.3 70B targets more demanding workloads, while Grok 3 Mini provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. Grok 3 Mini charges $0.50/1M output tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.3 70B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok 3 Mini has the edge here at $0.50/1M output tokens.
Best Use Cases
Choose Grok 3 Mini when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
- • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
- • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Choose Llama 3.3 70B when:
- • You need a larger context window (131,072 tokens)
- • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
Pros and Caveats at a Glance
Grok 3 Mini
- • Input pricing: $0.30/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $0.50/M tokens
- • Context window: 128,000 tokens
- • Max output: 131,072 tokens
Watch out for
- • Smaller context window than Llama 3.3 70B
Llama 3.3 70B
- • Input pricing: $0.88/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $0.88/M tokens
- • Context window: 131,072 tokens
- • Max output: 4,096 tokens
Watch out for
- • Higher input cost than Grok 3 Mini
- • Higher output cost than Grok 3 Mini
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Grok 3 Mini (xAI)
Llama 3.3 70B (Meta (via Together AI))
Start using Grok 3 Mini today
Sign Up for xAI →Start using Llama 3.3 70B today
Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI) →Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Grok 3 Mini or Llama 3.3 70B?▼
What is the context window difference between Grok 3 Mini and Llama 3.3 70B?▼
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼
Where can I compare xAI and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?▼
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.