Skip to main content

GPT-5 Pro vs Magistral Medium

Compare OpenAI and Mistral AI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5 Pro
vs
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5 Pro

Per Request:$0.075
Daily:$7.50
Monthly:$225.00
Yearly:$2,737.50

Magistral Medium

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Cost Differences

$0.0705
Per Request
$7.05
Daily
$211.50
Monthly
$2,573.25
Yearly

Magistral Medium costs less than GPT-5 Pro

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5 ProMagistral Medium
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$120.00/1M tokens$5.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output100,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textreasoning
Release Date8/7/202512/15/2025

GPT-5 Pro vs Magistral Medium: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5 Pro and Magistral Medium depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Magistral Medium is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M input tokens87% cheaper than GPT-5 Pro. Meanwhile, GPT-5 Pro offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Magistral Medium.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5 Pro is a flagship model while Magistral Medium is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5 Pro is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Magistral Medium offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5 Pro charges $120.00/1M output tokens vs $5.00 for Magistral Medium. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Magistral Medium has the edge here at $5.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-5 Pro supports vision (image inputs) while Magistral Medium is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5 Pro when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 100,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Magistral Medium when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5 Pro (OpenAI)

Magistral Medium (Mistral AI)

Start using GPT-5 Pro today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Magistral Medium today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Pro or Magistral Medium?
Magistral Medium is cheaper for input tokens at $2.00 per million tokens vs $15.00 for GPT-5 Pro — that's 87% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5 Pro and Magistral Medium?
GPT-5 Pro supports 200,000 tokens while Magistral Medium supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5 Pro.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Magistral Medium is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5 Pro offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Magistral Medium for budget sensitivity or GPT-5 Pro for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5 Pro costs about $225.00/month and Magistral Medium costs about $13.50/month. Overall, Magistral Medium has lower combined input + output rates ($2.00 in, $5.00 out) vs GPT-5 Pro.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles