Skip to main content

GPT-5 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5 Pro
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Scout

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5 Pro

Per Request:$0.075
Daily:$7.50
Monthly:$225.00
Yearly:$2,737.50

Llama 4 Scout

Per Request:$0.000230
Daily:$0.023
Monthly:$0.69
Yearly:$8.395

Cost Differences

$0.07477
Per Request
$7.477
Daily
$224.31
Monthly
$2,729.105
Yearly

Llama 4 Scout costs less than GPT-5 Pro

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5 ProLlama 4 Scout
ProviderOpenAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Output Price$120.00/1M tokens$0.30/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens10,000,000 tokens
Max Output100,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipefficient
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textvisioncode
Release Date8/7/20254/5/2025

GPT-5 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5 Pro and Llama 4 Scout depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.08/1M input tokens99% cheaper than GPT-5 Pro. Meanwhile, Llama 4 Scout offers a significantly larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for GPT-5 Pro.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5 Pro is a flagship model while Llama 4 Scout is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5 Pro is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Llama 4 Scout offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5 Pro charges $120.00/1M output tokens vs $0.30 for Llama 4 Scout. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Scout has the edge here at $0.30/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5 Pro when:

  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 100,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5 Pro (OpenAI)

Llama 4 Scout (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using GPT-5 Pro today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Llama 4 Scout today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Pro or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper for input tokens at $0.08 per million tokens vs $15.00 for GPT-5 Pro — that's 99% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5 Pro and Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-5 Pro supports 200,000 tokens while Llama 4 Scout supports 10,000,000 tokens — a difference of 9,800,000 tokens in favor of Llama 4 Scout.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Scout is the lower-cost option, while Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Scout for budget sensitivity or Llama 4 Scout for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5 Pro costs about $225.00/month and Llama 4 Scout costs about $0.69/month. Overall, Llama 4 Scout has lower combined input + output rates ($0.08 in, $0.30 out) vs GPT-5 Pro.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles