Skip to main content

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($1.50/M vs $30.00/M input tokens), while GPT-5.5 Pro is better for long-context tasks (1,050,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Mistral Medium 3.5 for lower token spend and choose GPT-5.5 Pro when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Pro
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.5 Pro

Per Request:$0.12
Daily:$12.00
Monthly:$360.00
Yearly:$4,380.00

Mistral Medium 3.5

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

$0.11475
Per Request
$11.475
Daily
$344.25
Monthly
$4,188.375
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less than GPT-5.5 Pro

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Mistral Medium 3.5. At the default workload, Mistral Medium 3.5 saves about $344.25/month ($4,188.375/year) versus GPT-5.5 Pro.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.5 ProMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Input Price$30.00/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Output Price$180.00/1M tokens$7.50/1M tokens
Context Window1,050,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output128,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryreasoningflagship
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textvisioncodereasoning
Release Date4/24/20264/29/2026

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.5 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Medium 3.5 is the more affordable option at $1.50/1M input tokens95% cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro. Meanwhile, GPT-5.5 Pro offers a significantly larger context window at 1,050,000 tokens vs 256,000 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5.5 Pro is a reasoning model while Mistral Medium 3.5 is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5.5 Pro is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Mistral Medium 3.5 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.5 Pro charges $180.00/1M output tokens vs $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Medium 3.5 has the edge here at $7.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.5 Pro when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,050,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 128,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

GPT-5.5 Pro

  • Input pricing: $30.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $180.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,050,000 tokens
  • Max output: 128,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Mistral Medium 3.5
  • Higher output cost than Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5

  • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $7.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 256,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than GPT-5.5 Pro

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.5 Pro (OpenAI)

Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI)

Start using GPT-5.5 Pro today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Mistral Medium 3.5 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper for input tokens at $1.50 per million tokens vs $30.00 for GPT-5.5 Pro — that's 95% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.5 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5?
GPT-5.5 Pro supports 1,050,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 794,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.5 Pro.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Mistral Medium 3.5 is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.5 Pro offers a larger context window (1,050,000 vs 256,000 tokens). Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.5 Pro for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.5 Pro costs about $360.00/month and Mistral Medium 3.5 costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Mistral Medium 3.5 has lower combined input + output rates ($1.50 in, $7.50 out) vs GPT-5.5 Pro.
Where can I compare OpenAI and Mistral AI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the OpenAI vs Mistral AI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.