Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
GPT-5.3 Codex
o1
Cost Differences
o1 costs more than GPT-5.3 Codex
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-5.3 Codex | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Input Price | $1.75/1M tokens | $15.00/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $14.00/1M tokens | $60.00/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 256,000 tokens | 200,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 32,768 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Category | coding | reasoning |
| Capabilities | textcode | textreasoning |
| Release Date | 3/1/2026 | 9/12/2024 |
GPT-5.3 Codex vs o1: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between GPT-5.3 Codex and o1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-5.3 Codex is the more affordable option at $1.75/1M input tokens — 88% cheaper than o1. Meanwhile, GPT-5.3 Codex offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 200,000 for o1.
These models target different tiers: GPT-5.3 Codex is a coding model while o1 is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o1 targets more demanding workloads, while GPT-5.3 Codex provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. GPT-5.3 Codex charges $14.00/1M output tokens vs $60.00 for o1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-5.3 Codex has the edge here at $14.00/1M output tokens.
Best Use Cases
Choose GPT-5.3 Codex when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
- • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
Choose o1 when:
- • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
- • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI)
o1 (OpenAI)
Start using GPT-5.3 Codex today
Sign Up for OpenAI →Start using o1 today
Sign Up for OpenAI →