Skip to main content

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Mistral Small 3.2

Compare OpenAI and Mistral AI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.3 Codex

Per Request:$0.008750
Daily:$0.875
Monthly:$26.25
Yearly:$319.375

Mistral Small 3.2

Per Request:$0.000150
Daily:$0.015
Monthly:$0.45
Yearly:$5.475

Cost Differences

$0.008600
Per Request
$0.86
Daily
$25.80
Monthly
$313.90
Yearly

Mistral Small 3.2 costs less than GPT-5.3 Codex

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexMistral Small 3.2
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Input Price$1.75/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Output Price$14.00/1M tokens$0.18/1M tokens
Context Window256,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens8,192 tokens
Categorycodingefficient
Capabilities
textcode
textcode
Release Date3/1/202612/2/2025

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Mistral Small 3.2: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.3 Codex and Mistral Small 3.2 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Small 3.2 is the more affordable option at $0.06/1M input tokens97% cheaper than GPT-5.3 Codex. Meanwhile, GPT-5.3 Codex offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Mistral Small 3.2.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5.3 Codex is a coding model while Mistral Small 3.2 is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Mistral Small 3.2 targets more demanding workloads, while GPT-5.3 Codex provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.3 Codex charges $14.00/1M output tokens vs $0.18 for Mistral Small 3.2. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Small 3.2 has the edge here at $0.18/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.3 Codex when:

  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Small 3.2 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI)

Mistral Small 3.2 (Mistral AI)

Start using GPT-5.3 Codex today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Mistral Small 3.2 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Codex or Mistral Small 3.2?
Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.06 per million tokens vs $1.75 for GPT-5.3 Codex — that's 97% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.3 Codex and Mistral Small 3.2?
GPT-5.3 Codex supports 256,000 tokens while Mistral Small 3.2 supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.3 Codex.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Mistral Small 3.2 is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.3 Codex offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Mistral Small 3.2 for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.3 Codex for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.3 Codex costs about $26.25/month and Mistral Small 3.2 costs about $0.45/month. Overall, Mistral Small 3.2 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.06 in, $0.18 out) vs GPT-5.3 Codex.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles