Skip to main content

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Llama 3.3 70B

Compare OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.3 70B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.3 Codex

Per Request:$0.008750
Daily:$0.875
Monthly:$26.25
Yearly:$319.375

Llama 3.3 70B

Per Request:$0.001320
Daily:$0.132
Monthly:$3.96
Yearly:$48.18

Cost Differences

$0.007430
Per Request
$0.743
Daily
$22.29
Monthly
$271.195
Yearly

Llama 3.3 70B costs less than GPT-5.3 Codex

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 3.3 70B
ProviderOpenAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$1.75/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Output Price$14.00/1M tokens$0.88/1M tokens
Context Window256,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens4,096 tokens
Categorycodingstandard
Capabilities
textcode
textcode
Release Date3/1/202612/6/2024

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Llama 3.3 70B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.3 Codex and Llama 3.3 70B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.3 70B is the more affordable option at $0.88/1M input tokens50% cheaper than GPT-5.3 Codex. Meanwhile, GPT-5.3 Codex offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Llama 3.3 70B.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5.3 Codex is a coding model while Llama 3.3 70B is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.3 70B targets more demanding workloads, while GPT-5.3 Codex provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.3 Codex charges $14.00/1M output tokens vs $0.88 for Llama 3.3 70B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.3 70B has the edge here at $0.88/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.3 Codex when:

  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.3 70B when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI)

Llama 3.3 70B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using GPT-5.3 Codex today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Llama 3.3 70B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Codex or Llama 3.3 70B?
Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper for input tokens at $0.88 per million tokens vs $1.75 for GPT-5.3 Codex — that's 50% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.3 Codex and Llama 3.3 70B?
GPT-5.3 Codex supports 256,000 tokens while Llama 3.3 70B supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 124,928 tokens in favor of GPT-5.3 Codex.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.3 70B is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.3 Codex offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Choose Llama 3.3 70B for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.3 Codex for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.3 Codex costs about $26.25/month and Llama 3.3 70B costs about $3.96/month. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B has lower combined input + output rates ($0.88 in, $0.88 out) vs GPT-5.3 Codex.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles