Skip to main content

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Llama 3.1 405B

Compare OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 405B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.3 Codex

Per Request:$0.008750
Daily:$0.875
Monthly:$26.25
Yearly:$319.375

Llama 3.1 405B

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

$0.003500
Per Request
$0.35
Daily
$10.50
Monthly
$127.75
Yearly

Llama 3.1 405B costs less than GPT-5.3 Codex

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 3.1 405B
ProviderOpenAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$1.75/1M tokens$3.50/1M tokens
Output Price$14.00/1M tokens$3.50/1M tokens
Context Window256,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Categorycodingflagship
Capabilities
textcode
textcodereasoning
Release Date3/1/20267/23/2024

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Llama 3.1 405B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.3 Codex and Llama 3.1 405B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 405B is the more affordable option at $3.50/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, GPT-5.3 Codex offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 405B.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5.3 Codex is a coding model while Llama 3.1 405B is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Llama 3.1 405B targets more demanding workloads, while GPT-5.3 Codex provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.3 Codex charges $14.00/1M output tokens vs $3.50 for Llama 3.1 405B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 405B has the edge here at $3.50/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.3 Codex when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.1 405B when:

  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI)

Llama 3.1 405B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using GPT-5.3 Codex today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Llama 3.1 405B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Codex or Llama 3.1 405B?
Llama 3.1 405B is cheaper for input tokens at $3.50 per million tokens vs $1.75 for GPT-5.3 Codex.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.3 Codex and Llama 3.1 405B?
GPT-5.3 Codex supports 256,000 tokens while Llama 3.1 405B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.3 Codex.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.1 405B is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.3 Codex offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 405B for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.3 Codex for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.3 Codex costs about $26.25/month and Llama 3.1 405B costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B has lower combined input + output rates ($3.50 in, $3.50 out) vs GPT-5.3 Codex.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles