Skip to main content

GPT-5.2 vs Grok Code Fast 1

Compare OpenAI and xAI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5.2
vs
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.2

Per Request:$0.008750
Daily:$0.875
Monthly:$26.25
Yearly:$319.375

Grok Code Fast 1

Per Request:$0.000950
Daily:$0.095
Monthly:$2.85
Yearly:$34.675

Cost Differences

$0.007800
Per Request
$0.78
Daily
$23.40
Monthly
$284.70
Yearly

Grok Code Fast 1 costs less than GPT-5.2

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2Grok Code Fast 1
ProviderOpenAIxAI
Input Price$1.75/1M tokens$0.20/1M tokens
Output Price$14.00/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipstandard
Capabilities
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
textcodereasoning
Release Date12/11/20252/1/2026

GPT-5.2 vs Grok Code Fast 1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.2 and Grok Code Fast 1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok Code Fast 1 is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens89% cheaper than GPT-5.2. Meanwhile, GPT-5.2 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 256,000 for Grok Code Fast 1.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and xAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to xAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5.2 is a flagship model while Grok Code Fast 1 is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5.2 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Grok Code Fast 1 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.2 charges $14.00/1M output tokens vs $1.50 for Grok Code Fast 1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok Code Fast 1 has the edge here at $1.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-5.2 supports vision (image inputs) while Grok Code Fast 1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.2 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.2 (OpenAI)

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)

Start using GPT-5.2 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today

Sign Up for xAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 or Grok Code Fast 1?
Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $1.75 for GPT-5.2 — that's 89% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.2 and Grok Code Fast 1?
GPT-5.2 supports 1,000,000 tokens while Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 744,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.2.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Grok Code Fast 1 is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.2 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 256,000 tokens). Choose Grok Code Fast 1 for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.2 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.2 costs about $26.25/month and Grok Code Fast 1 costs about $2.85/month. Overall, Grok Code Fast 1 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $1.50 out) vs GPT-5.2.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles