Skip to main content

GPT-5.2 pro vs o3-mini

Compare OpenAI and OpenAI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5.2 pro
vs
OpenAI
o3-mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.2 pro

Per Request:$0.105
Daily:$10.50
Monthly:$315.00
Yearly:$3,832.50

o3-mini

Per Request:$0.003300
Daily:$0.33
Monthly:$9.90
Yearly:$120.45

Cost Differences

$0.1017
Per Request
$10.17
Daily
$305.10
Monthly
$3,712.05
Yearly

o3-mini costs less than GPT-5.2 pro

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 proo3-mini
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Input Price$21.00/1M tokens$1.10/1M tokens
Output Price$168.00/1M tokens$4.40/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens500,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryreasoningreasoning
Capabilities
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
textreasoningcode
Release Date12/11/20251/31/2025

GPT-5.2 pro vs o3-mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.2 pro and o3-mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. o3-mini is the more affordable option at $1.10/1M input tokens95% cheaper than GPT-5.2 pro. Meanwhile, GPT-5.2 pro offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 500,000 for o3-mini.

Both models are in the reasoning category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: o3-mini would save you roughly $30,510.00/month compared to GPT-5.2 pro. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.2 pro charges $168.00/1M output tokens vs $4.40 for o3-mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. o3-mini has the edge here at $4.40/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-5.2 pro supports vision (image inputs) while o3-mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.2 pro when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose o3-mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.2 pro (OpenAI)

o3-mini (OpenAI)

Start using GPT-5.2 pro today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using o3-mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 pro or o3-mini?
o3-mini is cheaper for input tokens at $1.10 per million tokens vs $21.00 for GPT-5.2 pro — that's 95% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.2 pro and o3-mini?
GPT-5.2 pro supports 1,000,000 tokens while o3-mini supports 500,000 tokens — a difference of 500,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.2 pro.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, o3-mini is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.2 pro offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 500,000 tokens). Choose o3-mini for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.2 pro for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.2 pro costs about $315.00/month and o3-mini costs about $9.90/month. Overall, o3-mini has lower combined input + output rates ($1.10 in, $4.40 out) vs GPT-5.2 pro.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles